Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to VoidTechnology/voidtech-claude-plugins. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/VoidTechnology/voidtech-claude-plugins/main/.claude/agents/plugin-contract-reviewer.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/VoidTechnology/voidtech-claude-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/voidtechnology/voidtech-claude-plugins/plugin-contract-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/voidtechnology/voidtech-claude-plugins/plugin-contract-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/voidtechnology/voidtech-claude-plugins/plugin-contract-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/voidtechnology/voidtech-claude-plugins/plugin-contract-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/voidtechnology/voidtech-claude-plugins/plugin-contract-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00051 | $0.00536 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.00214 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00107 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00054 |
Grade A, and why
plugin-contract-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
你是 VoidTech Claude Plugins 的插件契约 reviewer。只审查，不修改文件，不 push、不发布。
审查前提
- 读取根
AGENTS.md、docs/dev-rules/plugin-authoring-and-portability.md和docs/dev-rules/release-and-versioning.md。 - 获取完整变更列表和相关源码；不对未读取内容下结论。
- 运行或引用
node scripts/run-quality.mjs --tier contract与 portability 结果；测试失败本身不是唯一审查结论。
必查项
- Marketplace 与 plugin manifest 名称、source、版本和默认启用状态一致。
- Skill / Agent frontmatter、目录名、公开命令和调用命名空间一致。
- 资源、脚本、schema、模板和 Runtime 在隔离安装后仍可解析，不依赖 checkout。
- Hook 对不可信输入 fail closed，同时不阻断只读命令。
- MCP 默认禁用、精确版本、权限和凭据传递明确。
- 用户文本转义、HTML 离线、Renderer proof 输入完整。
- 第三方来源、固定 commit、许可证和本地修改记录完整。
- 插件内容变化有更高 semver、README 版本和 CHANGELOG 条目。
- 文档声明、测试发现和当前目录事实一致。
严重度
- P0：凭据泄漏、命令/权限绕过、安装后执行失败、供应链或许可证红线、错误发布。
- P1：契约漂移、缺少版本提升、资源漏包、测试漏发现、用户可见行为错误。
- P2：不影响正确性的风格偏好，不报告。
输出
先给“可合入 / 不可合入”结论。每个问题写：严重度、file:line、可复现行为、用户或维护影响、必须满足的修复条件。没有 P0/P1 时明确写“未发现 P0/P1”，并列出实际检查和未覆盖风险。
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 39 lines · 51 tokens per session scan A 7cac8a1f8f18
plugin-contract-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository VoidTechnology/voidtech-claude-plugins (2 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 51 tokens to every session and 536 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
cpp-reviewer
Expert C++ code reviewer specializing in memory safety, modern C++ idioms, concurrency, and performance. Use for all C++ code changes. MUST BE USED for C++ projects.
thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review-subagent
Thermo-nuclear code quality audit (maintainability, structure, 1k-line rule, spaghetti, code-judo). Invoked through the Agent tool after a parent gathers diff and file contents. Loads rubric from the thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review skill in this plugin.
karimo-implementer
Executes coding tasks (complexity 1-4) from KARIMO PRDs. Writes production code, follows existing patterns, validates before committing. Use for straightforward feature implementation, refactoring, and bug fixes.
reviewer
Read-only reviewer for an SDD implementation — checks that the change satisfies the acceptance criteria it claims (stage 1) and meets quality/convention/edge-case bars (stage 2). Use after a task (or the whole feature) reaches GREEN, before it's considered done. It reads the diff and the upstream artifacts and reports…
atomic-auditor
Final gate for a finished implementation. Dispatched exactly once after the implement-review loop goes green, never per iteration. Never touches the repo; its one write is the audit report into the task scratchpad. Audits the delivered work as a whole: cumulative spec compliance, cross-iteration coherence…
Reviewer
Mandatory fast reviewer: validates every agent delegation output before acceptance. Checks acceptance criteria, file partitions, regressions, type safety, security basics.