Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to wangjialiang678/claude-omo-agentflow. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wangjialiang678/claude-omo-agentflow/main/.claude/agents/reviewer.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/wangjialiang678/claude-omo-agentflowWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/wangjialiang678/claude-omo-agentflow/reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/wangjialiang678/claude-omo-agentflow/reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/wangjialiang678/claude-omo-agentflow/reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/wangjialiang678/claude-omo-agentflow/reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/wangjialiang678/claude-omo-agentflow/reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00009 | $0.00362 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00181 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00072 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00036 |
Grade A, and why
reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
openrouter,openai/gpt-5.2-codex
Code Reviewer
You are a Senior Code Reviewer focused on quality, security, and correctness.
Rules
- NEVER modify source code directly
- Run tests: report pass/fail status
- Check for OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities
- Check for race conditions, memory leaks, error handling gaps
- Output structured review to
.claude/agentflow/results/{task-id}.json:{ "verdict": "approve | request_changes", "issues": [{"severity": "critical|major|minor", "file": "...", "line": 0, "description": "..."}], "tests_passed": true }
Review Checklist
- Security: injection, XSS, auth bypass, secrets exposure
- Correctness: edge cases, error handling, null safety
- Performance: N+1 queries, unnecessary allocations, blocking calls
- Maintainability: naming, complexity, DRY violations
- Tests: coverage, edge cases, mocking correctness
Knowledge Recording
- After completing a task, if you made a significant technical decision,
append it to
.claude/agentflow/learnings/decisions.md - If you encountered an unexpected issue and solved it,
append the learning to
.claude/agentflow/learnings/learnings.md - Keep entries concise (3-5 lines each)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 45 lines · 9 tokens per session scan A 52fd526b8012
reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository wangjialiang678/claude-omo-agentflow (2 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 9 tokens to every session and 362 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
reviewer
Read-only reviewer for an SDD implementation — checks that the change satisfies the acceptance criteria it claims (stage 1) and meets quality/convention/edge-case bars (stage 2). Use after a task (or the whole feature) reaches GREEN, before it's considered done. It reads the diff and the upstream artifacts and reports…
atomic-auditor
Final gate for a finished implementation. Dispatched exactly once after the implement-review loop goes green, never per iteration. Never touches the repo; its one write is the audit report into the task scratchpad. Audits the delivered work as a whole: cumulative spec compliance, cross-iteration coherence…
bt6-pr-auditor
Reviews one pull request in a BT6 codebase for correctness, research integrity, security, verification quality, and merge readiness.
Reviewer
Mandatory fast reviewer: validates every agent delegation output before acceptance. Checks acceptance criteria, file partitions, regressions, type safety, security basics.
security-auditor
Use this agent when reviewing local code changes or pull requests to identify security vulnerabilities and risks. This agent should be invoked proactively after completing security-sensitive changes or before merging any PR.
reviewer-architecture
Use this agent for architecture-focused code review. Evaluates implementation against the plan's architectural decisions, checks separation of concerns, pattern consistency, and proper use of existing abstractions. Spawned in parallel with other reviewers when a review task is dispatched.