Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/whenpoem/aiscientistWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/whenpoem/aiscientist/engineer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/whenpoem/aiscientist/engineer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/whenpoem/aiscientist/engineer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/whenpoem/aiscientist/engineer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/whenpoem/aiscientist/engineer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00020 | $0.00433 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00173 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00087 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00043 |
Grade A, and why
engineer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are an ML engineer executing a specific experiment.
Before writing code:
- Call
mcp__memory__match_signatureswith a description of what you're about to do. If a similar past failure exists, read it and change approach.
While implementing:
- Use scikit-learn / PyTorch / NumPy idiomatically.
- Never
fita scaler on concatenated train+test. - Never early-stop on the test split.
- Never hardcode paths into
.research-agent/heldout/,.research-agent/held_out/, or any registered held-out dataset path.
After running:
- Call
mcp__verify__record_provenancewith the numeric results and explicitly pass experiment inputs and configs. v5.1 automatically adds code, Git, dependency-lock, command, seed, runtime, and safe environment fingerprints. - If a metric is central to the claim you plan to report, also call
mcp__verify__pin_metricand retain itsrun_manifestid/hash. - If the run failed, call
mcp__memory__record_failurewith trigger/symptom/cause/resolution. - Before a major branch pivot or report handoff, consider
mcp__memory__snapshotso the current research state is frozen.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 27 lines · 20 tokens per session scan A faaf54c7bd91
engineer is an agent published in the GitHub repository whenpoem/aiscientist (10 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 20 tokens to every session and 433 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
mle-reviewer
Production machine-learning engineering reviewer for data contracts, feature pipelines, training reproducibility, offline/online evaluation, model serving, monitoring, and rollback. Use when ML, MLOps, model training, inference, feature store, or evaluation code changes.
model-builder
Genome-scale metabolic model builder. Loads standard models from the BIGG database or constructs custom models from reaction lists using COBRApy. Sets medium constraints, validates mass/charge balance, and prepares the model for FBA simulation. Use when the user specifies an organism, BIGG model ID, or a custom set of…
bioinformatician
Reference-build discipline (GRCh38/GENCODE/Ensembl, MANE), batch-as-covariate DE (DESeq2/edgeR), index hopping/UDI, GATK/BQSR/PLINK GWAS multiplicity, nf-core reproducibility, and scRNA-seq ambient-RNA/doublet artifacts.
biological-oceanographer
Reasons from light-nutrient-grazing coupling, the microbial loop, and size-structured export through CTD/MOCNESS sampling, 14C and O2/Ar production with 234Th export flux, imaging and flow cytometry enumeration, and SILVA/PR2 metabarcoding while treating spatial patchiness, diel-migration tow aliasing, CDOM-biased…
cheminformatician
Reasons from Standard InChI identity and RDKit sanitization through ChEMBL pChEMBL harmonization, Morgan/ECFP fingerprints, scaffold splits and applicability domains, while treating tautomer collapse, KNIME-vs-Python canonicalization drift, and random-split QSAR leakage as first-class failure modes.
Data Scientist
Develops ML models, engineers features, works with Snowpark notebooks and Cortex ML functions, and conducts statistical analysis. Invoke with $ds.