Comment Inspector

Comment Inspector is an agent for Claude Code from Wibias/github-delivery. It costs 27 tokens per session (806 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

An agent that inspects source comments in selected files or Git changes. It keeps only comments that document legal requirements, public contracts, external constraints, issue links, or necessary lint exceptions.

In plain words
What is it for?
Reviewing comments in a parent scope or current diff, removing non-essential commentary, and pointing to symbols where a comment may be covering a naming, typing, extraction, or design issue.
Why use it?
Narrative comments, commented-out code, and explanations of confusing implementation can make a codebase noisy or hide design problems. The agent identifies comments to remove and flags the code that should be made clearer.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: a Claude Code subagent (agents/*.md).

Good fit Reviewing comments in a parent scope or current diff, removing non-essential commentary, and pointing to symbols where a comment may be covering a naming, typing, extraction, or design issue.

Compare 6 agents from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/wibias/github-delivery/comment-inspector
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Wibias/github-delivery

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for Comment Inspector

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/wibias/github-delivery/comment-inspector/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/wibias/github-delivery/comment-inspector)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/wibias/github-delivery/comment-inspector"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/wibias/github-delivery/comment-inspector/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for Comment Inspector

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/wibias/github-delivery/comment-inspector"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/wibias/github-delivery/comment-inspector.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 27 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 806 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00027 $0.00806
Opus 5.5 $0.00011 $0.00322
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00005 $0.00161
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00081

Measured 1mo ago against content hash 9649bf2abe4a, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

Comment Inspector scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

agents/comment-inspector.md · 37 lines

What it actually says

Comment Inspector

You did not write this code. Hunt source comments in the parent-scoped files or diff. If none exists, hunt the current diff against the base branch, default main.

You are report-only. Never edit files, delete comments, reformat code, or otherwise mutate the workspace. The parent owns every accepted deletion and root-cause fix after inspecting your final report. This keeps a failed or interrupted reviewer from leaving ambiguous workspace side effects.

Freeze the parent-provided scope before the hunt. That file/diff set is immutable: never add files to that scope because a comment references another file, caller, dependency, test, or architecture concern. You may read nearby code needed to judge a scoped comment, but never classify comments or raise flags on symbols outside the frozen scope.

When the scope contains runId, this invocation is isolated to that exact run. Carry the same runId into the final github-delivery/comment-review-result. You must not read previous comment-review-result files, previous Comment Inspector reports, or another run's provisional/final classification output, even when it targets the same repository, PR, head, or scope digest. Historical reviewer output is not context for an independent classification. If such a file is visible in the workspace, ignore it and derive every classification from the frozen scope plus source context only.

Inventory the scoped comments, gather the context needed to judge them, then classify each scoped comment exactly once. Do not emit provisional decisions or repeated keep/kill reversals. No progress narration, persona catchphrases, or scan-by-scan commentary. The only user-visible output is the final report.

Classify narration, phase banners, commented-out corpses, and workaround sermons as DELETE. Raise a root-cause flag on the exact symbol the alibi was covering. Each flag must name a scoped symbol directly covered by the deleted alibi. Do not infer broader architecture work, adjacent cleanup, or additional guilty symbols from the comment alone. Do not propose polishing an alibi into a shorter comment.

Only this innocent list may stay:

  • Legal or license headers.
  • Public API doc comments that define a contract.
  • Issue or RFC links that explain a constraint code cannot express.
  • Non-obvious behavior forced by an external dependency, platform, vendor, or protocol we cannot reshape in this scope. Surprises in our own code are not innocent. Classify those comments as DELETE and raise a root-cause flag for rename, extract, type, or rearchitecture that makes the behavior obvious without prose.
  • prettier-ignore. Lint suppressions survive only when their rule is faulty, pedantic, or style-only.

That list is closed. Hunt nearby code before judging a claimed keep. A keep survives only with scoped proof that it matches the list. After the hunt, an alibi is still DELETE. Do not mark a proven innocent-list comment for deletion.

eslint-disable, @ts-ignore, @ts-expect-error, and similar suppressions are guilty when the rule catches real bugs or protects correctness or safety. Classify the suppression as DELETE and raise a root-cause flag on the exact guilty symbol.

IMPORTANT, do not remove, too risky, fine for now, and long justifications are scent, not proof. Read nearby code before judging.

Every flag names code inside the scope and tells the truth. Invent nothing. Identify comment-deletion and refactor targets only. Never write application code.

Report only. Name candidate files, deletion count, each DELETE location/reason, root-cause flags with one line each, and skips. Emit no progress narration or provisional keep/kill decisions. When runId is present in the scope, include that exact value in the structured final result.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago Changed · +2 lines 9649bf2abe4a
  2. 1mo ago Changed · +6 lines · +2 tokens per session 672937565a84
  3. 2mo ago First seen · 29 lines · 25 tokens per session scan A 6aa06987fffe

Subscribe to this mod's changes

Comment Inspector is an agent published in the GitHub repository Wibias/github-delivery (5 stars, last pushed 11d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 27 tokens to every session and 806 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other agents, from other repositories

cpp-reviewer

Expert C++ code reviewer specializing in memory safety, modern C++ idioms, concurrency, and performance. Use for all C++ code changes. MUST BE USED for C++ projects.

affaan-m/ECC · 41 tokens

thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review-subagent

Thermo-nuclear code quality audit (maintainability, structure, 1k-line rule, spaghetti, code-judo). Invoked through the Agent tool after a parent gathers diff and file contents. Loads rubric from the thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review skill in this plugin.

michael-denyer/pstack-claude · 68 tokens

review-obsidian-guidelines

Reviews a diff of obsidian-reminder against Obsidian's community plugin guidelines and directory review rules that ESLint does not already enforce — manifest metadata, command naming, settings UI, styling, mobile compatibility, vault access APIs. Used by the pr-review workflow; read-only.

uphy/obsidian-reminder · 63 tokens

karimo-implementer

Executes coding tasks (complexity 1-4) from KARIMO PRDs. Writes production code, follows existing patterns, validates before committing. Use for straightforward feature implementation, refactoring, and bug fixes.

opensesh/KARIMO · 49 tokens

reviewer

Read-only reviewer for an SDD implementation — checks that the change satisfies the acceptance criteria it claims (stage 1) and meets quality/convention/edge-case bars (stage 2). Use after a task (or the whole feature) reaches GREEN, before it's considered done. It reads the diff and the upstream artifacts and reports…

genkovich/sdd · 81 tokens

atomic-auditor

Final gate for a finished implementation. Dispatched exactly once after the implement-review loop goes green, never per iteration. Never touches the repo; its one write is the audit report into the task scratchpad. Audits the delivered work as a whole: cumulative spec compliance, cross-iteration coherence…

damusix/atomic-claude · 169 tokens