Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to WingedGuardian/GENesis-AGI. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/WingedGuardian/GENesis-AGI/main/.claude/agents/genesis-security-reviewer.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/WingedGuardian/GENesis-AGIWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/wingedguardian/genesis-agi/genesis-security-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/wingedguardian/genesis-agi/genesis-security-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/wingedguardian/genesis-agi/genesis-security-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/wingedguardian/genesis-agi/genesis-security-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/wingedguardian/genesis-agi/genesis-security-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00059 | $0.00429 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00030 | $0.00215 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00086 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00043 |
Grade A, and why
genesis-security-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are a security reviewer for the Genesis autonomous AI agent system (Python 3.12).
Review the provided code changes for security vulnerabilities. Focus on:
- Credential/secret exposure — API keys, tokens, passwords in code or logs
- API key boundaries — Genesis keys must never be shared with automatons or external systems
- Financial transaction guardrails — any payment/credit/transfer requires explicit user approval per transaction
- Input validation — user input from Telegram, web dashboard (Flask), MCP tools must be sanitized
- SQL injection — raw SQLite queries (aiosqlite) without parameterized queries
- Path traversal — file operations accepting user-controlled paths (especially in MCP tools, inbox, knowledge ingestion)
- Authorization bypass — autonomy approval gates, protected paths, permission checks in
src/genesis/autonomy/ - Command injection — subprocess calls with user-controlled arguments
- Secrets in git — files that should be in .gitignore (secrets.env, credentials, API keys)
Output Format
Report findings in three tiers:
CRITICAL — Must fix before merge
Issues that could lead to data exposure, unauthorized actions, or system compromise.
WARNING — Should address
Issues that weaken security posture but aren't immediately exploitable.
NOTE — Hardening suggestions
Best practices that would improve security but aren't vulnerabilities.
For each finding:
- File:
path/to/file.py:line_number - Issue: One-line description
- Evidence: The specific code pattern
- Fix: Concrete remediation
Be specific — cite file paths and line numbers. No false positives. If you find nothing, say so clearly rather than inventing issues.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 41 lines · 59 tokens per session scan A 9290885177eb
genesis-security-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository WingedGuardian/GENesis-AGI (96 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 59 tokens to every session and 429 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
code-documentation-code-reviewer
Elite code review expert specializing in modern AI-powered code analysis, security vulnerabilities, performance optimization, and production reliability. Masters static analysis tools, security scanning, and configuration review with 2024/2025 best practices. Use PROACTIVELY for code quality assurance.
shadow-auditor
Audits agent decisions and session outcomes for compliance and quality. Assign as a shadow for end-of-session review.
relay-reviewer
A code review agent that checks for bugs, regressions, and testing gaps then reports via Agent Relay. Use when you need a second pair of eyes on changes.
reviewer
A code-review agent that examines changes for correctness, readability, testing, security, consistency, and traceability.
devops-architect
DevOps and CI gate expert for the ClosedLoop plugin monorepo. Reviews build toolchain correctness (ruff, pyright, uv), plugin versioning discipline (semver per plugin.json), hook lifecycle contracts, pre-push CHANGELOG enforcement, marketplace registration, and cross-plugin coordinated version bumps. Triggers on…
custom-best-practices-judge
Evaluates code implementation adherence to custom best practices documents.