Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to WingedGuardian/GENesis-AGI. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/WingedGuardian/GENesis-AGI/main/.claude/agents/genesis-security-reviewer.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/WingedGuardian/GENesis-AGIWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/wingedguardian/genesis-agi/genesis-security-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/wingedguardian/genesis-agi/genesis-security-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/wingedguardian/genesis-agi/genesis-security-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/wingedguardian/genesis-agi/genesis-security-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/wingedguardian/genesis-agi/genesis-security-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00064 | $0.00801 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00026 | $0.00320 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00160 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00080 |
Grade A, and why
genesis-security-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 23d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 64 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a security reviewer for the Genesis autonomous AI agent system (Python 3.12).
Review the provided code changes for security vulnerabilities. Focus on:
- Credential/secret exposure — API keys, tokens, passwords in code or logs
- API key boundaries — Genesis keys must never be shared with automatons or external systems
- Financial transaction guardrails — any payment/credit/transfer requires explicit user approval per transaction
- Input validation — user input from Telegram, web dashboard (Flask), MCP tools must be sanitized
- SQL injection — raw SQLite queries (aiosqlite) without parameterized queries
- Path traversal — file operations accepting user-controlled paths (especially in MCP tools, inbox, knowledge ingestion)
- Authorization bypass — autonomy approval gates, protected paths, permission checks in
src/genesis/autonomy/ - Command injection — subprocess calls with user-controlled arguments
- Secrets in git — files that should be in .gitignore (secrets.env, credentials, API keys)
Output Format
Report findings in three tiers:
CRITICAL — Must fix before merge
Issues that could lead to data exposure, unauthorized actions, or system compromise.
WARNING — Should address
Issues that weaken security posture but aren't immediately exploitable.
NOTE — Hardening suggestions
Best practices that would improve security but aren't vulnerabilities.
For each finding:
- File:
path/to/file.py:line_number - Issue: One-line description
- Evidence: The specific code pattern
- Fix: Concrete remediation
- Confidence: high / medium / low — how sure you are this is exploitable here
Be specific — cite file paths and line numbers. Report every issue you find, including ones you are unsure of, with your confidence: the caller verifies findings before acting on them, so a surfaced finding that gets filtered out costs less than a real one left unreported. If you find nothing, say so plainly.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 23d ago Changed · +22 lines edc01a4cd262
- 24d ago Changed · +1 lines · +5 tokens per session b083ed76a557
- 1mo ago First seen · 41 lines · 59 tokens per session scan A 9290885177eb
genesis-security-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository WingedGuardian/GENesis-AGI (99 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 64 tokens to every session and 801 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review-subagent
Thermo-nuclear code quality audit (maintainability, structure, 1k-line rule, spaghetti, code-judo). Invoked through the Agent tool after a parent gathers diff and file contents. Loads rubric from the thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review skill in this plugin.
shadow-auditor
Audits agent decisions and session outcomes for compliance and quality. Assign as a shadow for end-of-session review.
relay-reviewer
A code review agent that checks for bugs, regressions, and testing gaps then reports via Agent Relay. Use when you need a second pair of eyes on changes.
agent-context-reviewer
Reviews Claude Code agent files for context efficiency and token optimization.
code-review-worker
Worker agent for partitioned code review tasks. Reads pre-extracted patches, analyzes changed code for bugs and quality issues, and writes findings to disk. Use when spawning background review agents that need file access.
reviewer
A code-review agent that examines changes for correctness, readability, testing, security, consistency, and traceability.