merge_request_discussion_auditor

merge_request_discussion_auditor is an agent for Claude Code from wiolett-industries/marketplace. It costs 28 tokens per session (178 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A read-only reviewer that examines GitLab merge-request discussions before code review begins. It looks for unresolved blockers, changes since earlier commits, and conclusions that may no longer apply.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it when a merge request has many, old, or contradictory discussions and you need an intake report first.
Why use it?
It prevents reviewers from overlooking important conversation history or approving changes based on stale information.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: effort in frontmatter. Also seen: model in frontmatter.

Part of the merge-request-review plugin — 1 skill, 4 agents shipped together

Good fit Use it when a merge request has many, old, or contradictory discussions and you need an intake report first.

Compare 6 agents from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/wiolett-industries/marketplace/merge_request_discussion_auditor
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/wiolett-industries/marketplace

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install merge-request-review, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 1 skill, 4 agents.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for merge_request_discussion_auditor

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/wiolett-industries/marketplace/merge_request_discussion_auditor/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/wiolett-industries/marketplace/merge_request_discussion_auditor)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/wiolett-industries/marketplace/merge_request_discussion_auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/wiolett-industries/marketplace/merge_request_discussion_auditor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for merge_request_discussion_auditor

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/wiolett-industries/marketplace/merge_request_discussion_auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/wiolett-industries/marketplace/merge_request_discussion_auditor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 28 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 178 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00028 $0.00178
Opus 5.5 $0.00011 $0.00071
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00006 $0.00036
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00018

Measured 2mo ago against content hash 2eca35ac6591, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

merge_request_discussion_auditor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/merge-request-review/agents/merge_request_discussion_auditor.md · 31 lines

What it actually says

Merge Request Discussion Auditor

Analyze existing MR discussions before code review starts.

Identify:

  • unresolved blocking threads
  • resolved threads that may have regressed
  • author updates that require re-review
  • plugin-created findings that must not be approved over
  • stale conclusions tied to older commits

You MUST end every reply with exactly this block (no prose after it):

Output a concise discussion intake report with:

  • current blocker state
  • threads needing verification
  • resolved context worth preserving
  • whether code review can proceed
  • artifacts or GitLab thread IDs that must be carried into state
Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2mo ago First seen · 31 lines · 28 tokens per session scan A 2eca35ac6591

Subscribe to this mod's changes

merge_request_discussion_auditor is an agent published in the GitHub repository wiolett-industries/marketplace (10 stars, last pushed 15d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 28 tokens to every session and 178 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

merge_request_discussion_auditor compared with agents from other repositories

merge_request_discussion_auditor next to 6 agents from other repositories
ModTypeStarsLast pushLicenceScanTokensWorks with
merge_request_discussion_auditorwiolett-industries/marketplaceAgent1015d agoMITA28Claude Code
cpp-revieweraffaan-m/ECCAgent298k5d agoMITA41Claude Code, Kiro
thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review-subagentmichael-denyer/pstack-claudeAgent4.1kyesterdayMITA68Claude Code
review-obsidian-guidelinesuphy/obsidian-reminderAgent662yesterdayMITA63Claude Code
karimo-implementeropensesh/KARIMOAgent29025d agoApache-2.0A49Claude Code
atomic-auditordamusix/atomic-claudeAgent1155d agoMITA169Claude Code
reviewergenkovich/sddAgent19922d agoMITA81Claude Code