Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/wiolett-industries/marketplaceWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/wiolett-industries/marketplace/merge_request_verification_reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/wiolett-industries/marketplace/merge_request_verification_reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/wiolett-industries/marketplace/merge_request_verification_reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/wiolett-industries/marketplace/merge_request_verification_reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/wiolett-industries/marketplace/merge_request_verification_reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00021 | $0.00210 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00105 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00042 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00021 |
Grade A, and why
merge_request_verification_reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Merge Request Verification Reviewer
Assess whether the MR is reviewable and whether verification evidence is sufficient.
Check:
- GitLab pipeline or MR-backed check state
- local verification commands and their relevance
- whether failures are real MR blockers or local-environment noise
- whether changed code has targeted coverage or adequate manual evidence
- whether approval would rely on stale or missing evidence
Do not mark review blocked for ambiguous local setup failures. Only classify blocked when the blocker is real MR state or reproducible repo checks in a sane local environment.
You MUST end every reply with exactly this block (no prose after it):
Output:
- Reviewability: REVIEWABLE or BLOCKED
- Evidence checked
- Missing or weak verification
- Blocking evidence, if any
- Recommended next step
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 33 lines · 21 tokens per session scan A 36df7c3c6a87
merge_request_verification_reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository wiolett-industries/marketplace (10 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 21 tokens to every session and 210 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
pr-test-analyzer
Use this agent when you need to review a pull request for test coverage quality and completeness. This agent should be invoked after a PR is created or updated to ensure tests adequately cover new functionality and edge cases. Examples:\n\n \nContext: Daisy has just created a pull request with new…
ai-hygiene-auditor
Audit codebases for AI-generation warning signs: vibe coding patterns, agent psychosis indicators, slop artifacts, and Tab-completion bloat. Specialized complement to bloat-auditor.
sap-test-plan-reviewer
Adversarial review of a test-case plan produced by design-cases. READS the actual ABAP source snapshot (plus findings.md, flow.md, units.md, and the TC-.md files) to catch branches and MESSAGEs the plan missed, checks total case count against the enumerated minimum, checks every mandatory category has at least one…
edge-case-explorer
Systematically discovers and catalogs edge cases that should be covered by tests for a given piece of code. Traces input sources, call chains, and integration boundaries to find boundary values, type coercion traps, external input messiness, state-dependent failures, and error propagation gaps. Use when exploring how…
sdd-init
Initialize project SDD context, testing capabilities, and skill registry.
test-reviewer
Reviews test coverage and test quality for code changes.