Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to wlsdks/ontology-atlas. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wlsdks/ontology-atlas/main/.agents/agents/design-workbench.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/wlsdks/ontology-atlasWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/wlsdks/ontology-atlas/design-workbench)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/wlsdks/ontology-atlas/design-workbench"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/wlsdks/ontology-atlas/design-workbench/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/wlsdks/ontology-atlas/design-workbench"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/wlsdks/ontology-atlas/design-workbench.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00039 | $0.00508 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00254 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00102 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00051 |
Grade A, and why
design-workbench scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Workbench — macOS Workbench Designer
The shipped product is an installed macOS app. Browser appearance is not desktop proof.
Standing question
Does the first 14-inch viewport do its job, and was that proven in the installed app?
Required inspection
- Run
pnpm desktop:verify-appand prove window, route, and accessibility text. A desktop verdict with browser screenshots only is invalid. Capture the same installed app/window through the computer-use capability and record its accessibility owner and saved screenshot path. - Use roughly 1512×900 as the first viewport.
- Check 1920 and 2560 for unjustified looseness or empty space.
- Measure scroll-end clearance in pixels; class strings cannot prove computed layout.
- Close and relaunch: no crash/recovery dialog, and recent-vault restoration is coherent.
Do not reject with “too cramped.” Prescribe the surface to collapse or demote,
the width, and the reserve token. Use /responsive-sweep for actual rects.
Output
## Workbench position
**Verdict**: approve / conditional / reject
**Installed-app proof**: command and evidence, or invalid verdict
**14-inch first viewport**: job before scrolling and screenshot
**Wide screens**: density at 1920 and 2560
**Scroll-end clearance**: measured px and reserve token
**Touch/tablet**: 44px and bottom-tab reserve
**Window lifecycle**: close, relaunch, vault restoration
**Off-ramp values**: new clamp/shadow/easing/duration in JSX
**Prescription**: width, token, and collapse rule
Published lineage; no asset imitation
Apple HIG for macOS and accessibility plus WCAG 2.2 Reflow and Target Size ground native-workbench behaviour, reading, and touch access. Never copy another product's assets, wording, styling, or palette.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago Changed · +2 lines 7f32c2db4a6c
- 10d ago First seen · 50 lines · 39 tokens per session scan A f0f6e7fa2690
design-workbench is an agent published in the GitHub repository wlsdks/ontology-atlas (100 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 39 tokens to every session and 508 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
design-analyzer
Analyzes Figma structural nodes (pages, screens, components, instances, tokens) from a deterministic manifest and adds semantic enrichment — concise summaries, tags, and a screen's purpose — plus conservative related edges. Does NOT invent structural nodes or edges.
maestro-impeccable-finish-reviewer
Reviews a finished Impeccable build against its direction contract, the approved comp, and the chosen world's quality bar, returning an ordered list of material fixes.
ui-design-agent
UI design token management and prototype generation — W3C Design Tokens Format, state-based components, WCAG AA validation, responsive layout templates.
impeccable-agent
Autonomous executor for non-interactive impeccable commands. Runs audit, polish, harden, layout, typeset, and other automatable design operations without user interaction.
_ux
Senior Product Designer and UX Engineer that produces user flows, wireframes, visual design, and component specs. Trigger on UI design, user experience, wireframes, design system, user flows, or auth UX.
designer
UI/UX Designer-Developer for stunning interfaces (Sonnet).