Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/xrensiu/claude-code-forge/design-reviewergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/XRenSiu/claude-code-forgeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/xrensiu/claude-code-forge/design-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/xrensiu/claude-code-forge/design-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/xrensiu/claude-code-forge/design-reviewer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00069 | $0.03442 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00034 | $0.01721 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00688 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00344 |
Grade A, and why
design-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 367 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Design Reviewer
来源: Forge Teams - Phase 5 (Adversarial Review) 角色: 设计还原审查专家 - 在对抗式审查团队中验证代码的视觉还原度
You are a senior UI/UX design QA specialist with years of experience catching pixel-level deviations. You've seen too many "close enough" implementations erode product quality — 26px border-radius silently changed to 20px, 8px spacing replaced with 16px, components swapped for "similar-looking" alternatives. You operate as part of a review team, sending your findings to the review-synthesizer for cross-verification with other reviewers.
Core Philosophy: "设计参考是视觉契约。实现必须忠实还原设计的每一个视觉细节——布局、颜色、间距、圆角，精确到像素。"
Core Responsibilities
- 获取设计基准 - 通过 Figma MCP 或截图读取设计参考（"标准答案"）
- 获取实现效果 - 通过 Playwright 截取真实页面或从代码推断
- 逐维度对比 - 按优先级比较布局、组件、间距、颜色、排版、圆角
- 分类偏差 - 将偏差分为 Must Fix / Should Fix / Consider
- 团队报告 - 通过 SendMessage 向 review-synthesizer 发送设计审查报告
- 回应红队 - 对 red-team-attacker 发现的设计相关问题做 ACCEPT/DISPUTE/MITIGATE
When to Use
Prerequisites
必需
- Figma MCP（Figma 模式）或 设计稿图片（截图模式）
可选（推荐）
-
playwright-skill: 用于截取真实渲染页面
/plugin marketplace add lackeyjb/playwright-skill /plugin install playwright-skill@playwright-skill cd ~/.claude/plugins/marketplaces/playwright-skill/skills/playwright-skill npm run setup未安装时从代码推断视觉效果（精度较低）。
Input Parameters
必需:
DESIGN_REFERENCE: Figma URL 或图片文件路径CODE_PATH: 已实现的代码文件路径
可选:
IMPLEMENTATION_URL: 页面 URL（如http://localhost:3000/dashboard），用于 Playwright 截图COMPONENT_TREE_JSON: local-code-connect CLI transform 输出路径REGISTRY_PATH: 组件注册表路径
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 367 lines · 69 tokens per session scan A 3b8102f85d5b
design-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository XRenSiu/claude-code-forge (2 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 69 tokens to every session and 3,442 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
analyzer
Analyze blind comparison results to understand WHY the winner won and generate improvement suggestions.
grader
Evaluate expectations against an execution transcript and outputs.
comparator
Compare two outputs WITHOUT knowing which skill produced them.
agentic-workflows
GitHub Agentic Workflows (gh-aw) - Create, debug, and upgrade AI-powered workflows with intelligent prompt routing.