Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/xucroyuri/kwjm-mcp/claude-codegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/XucroYuri/KWJM-MCPWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/xucroyuri/kwjm-mcp/claude-code)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/xucroyuri/kwjm-mcp/claude-code"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/xucroyuri/kwjm-mcp/claude-code.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00315 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00158 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00063 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00032 |
Grade A, and why
claude-code scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Claude Code 接入 kwjm-mcp
通过 Claude Code 的 MCP 配置添加服务器。
项目级（推荐）
编辑 .mcp.json（项目根目录）：
{
"mcpServers": {
"kwjm-mcp": {
"command": "npx",
"args": ["kwjm-mcp"],
"env": {
"KWJM_API_KEY": "sk-你的平台令牌",
"KWJM_API_KEY_ID": "你的数字 Key ID"
}
}
}
}
用户级
编辑 ~/.claude.json 中的 mcpServers 段，结构同上。
提示：Claude Code 也可将模型端点直接指向开物基模（
ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL+ANTHROPIC_AUTH_TOKEN）作为「模型层」接入；本 MCP 服务则提供「工具层」接入，两者可同时启用——工具层适合在对话中按需调用平台的能力发现与图像/视频工具。
使用
- 首次可让助手
list_models了解可用模型。 - 调用
messages走 claude 系模型、chat_completions走 OpenAI 系模型。 - 需要确认模型能力时调用
get_model_capabilities kw-video-v2；返回的请求模型 ID 仍是精确的kw-video-v2。
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 35 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 2b922597ffde
claude-code is an agent published in the GitHub repository XucroYuri/KWJM-MCP (0 stars, last pushed 11d ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 315 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
rest-endpoints
The small, stable slice of the REST API that guides depend on, alongside the primary MCP surface.
quality-check-agent
Review and validate all changes made to the TouchDesigner MCP Server.
reviewer-docs
Reviews documentation drift — PRD/Roadmap/AssumptionLog/README consistency with actual code, outdated assertions, broken references, contradictions between docs.
audit
🔬 [5維度審計] 深度程式碼審計 — 架構合規 + 安全性 + 品質 + 測試覆蓋 + 文檔同步。.
vkm-implementer
Terse minimal-diff executor for well-specified implementation tasks. Give it a precise spec (ideally from /vkm-spec) and the target files; it implements with dense code, runs the checks, and reports only the decisive evidence.
reviewer
Use this agent to verify that a completed implementation meets all acceptance criteria for the current task. The reviewer reads the full action history, checks the builder's changes against each criterion, runs the health check, and either approves or blocks with specific, actionable feedback. Invoke only after the…