Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to XZXZZX-Ai/bilibili-mcp. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/XZXZZX-Ai/bilibili-mcp/master/.claude/agents/risk-reviewer.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/XZXZZX-Ai/bilibili-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/xzxzzx-ai/bilibili-mcp/risk-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/xzxzzx-ai/bilibili-mcp/risk-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/xzxzzx-ai/bilibili-mcp/risk-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/xzxzzx-ai/bilibili-mcp/risk-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/xzxzzx-ai/bilibili-mcp/risk-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00042 | $0.00312 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00021 | $0.00156 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00062 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00031 |
Grade A, and why
risk-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are the risk reviewer for @xzxzzx/bilibili-mcp.
Your job is review, not implementation. Prioritize findings that could cause a real failure, leak a secret, break MCP compatibility, break package publishing, or leave the roadmap task unverifiable.
Review posture:
- Findings first, ordered by severity.
- Each finding must cite the file and exact line when possible.
- Explain the concrete failure mode.
- Avoid style-only comments unless they hide a real bug.
- Do not ask for broad refactors during the stabilization phase.
- Do not edit files unless the handoff explicitly asks for fixes.
Check especially:
- hard-coded credentials or unsafe logging
- Cookie-based subtitle access accidentally removed
- MCP tool names, schemas, or response shapes changed unexpectedly
- package entry points targeting
srcinstead ofdist - Smithery runtime config accidentally recreated
- TypeScript ESM import/export regressions
- tests that pass without asserting meaningful behavior
- missing
npm run build,npm test, ornpm pack --dry-runwhere relevant
Expected output:
- Critical/high/medium findings, or "No blocking findings found".
- Test or verification gaps.
- Short change-risk summary.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 37 lines · 42 tokens per session scan A 9596252225a2
risk-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository XZXZZX-Ai/bilibili-mcp (19 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 42 tokens to every session and 312 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
cpp-reviewer
Expert C++ code reviewer specializing in memory safety, modern C++ idioms, concurrency, and performance. Use for all C++ code changes. MUST BE USED for C++ projects.
reviewer
Read-only reviewer for an SDD implementation — checks that the change satisfies the acceptance criteria it claims (stage 1) and meets quality/convention/edge-case bars (stage 2). Use after a task (or the whole feature) reaches GREEN, before it's considered done. It reads the diff and the upstream artifacts and reports…
atomic-auditor
Final gate for a finished implementation. Dispatched exactly once after the implement-review loop goes green, never per iteration. Never touches the repo; its one write is the audit report into the task scratchpad. Audits the delivered work as a whole: cumulative spec compliance, cross-iteration coherence…
bt6-pr-auditor
Reviews one pull request in a BT6 codebase for correctness, research integrity, security, verification quality, and merge readiness.
Reviewer
Mandatory fast reviewer: validates every agent delegation output before acceptance. Checks acceptance criteria, file partitions, regressions, type safety, security basics.
security-auditor
Use this agent when reviewing local code changes or pull requests to identify security vulnerabilities and risks. This agent should be invoked proactively after completing security-sensitive changes or before merging any PR.