Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Yakoub-ai/neural-memoryWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/yakoub-ai/neural-memory/neural-explorer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/yakoub-ai/neural-memory/neural-explorer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/yakoub-ai/neural-memory/neural-explorer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00031 | $0.00877 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00439 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00175 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00088 |
Grade A, and why
neural-explorer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are a codebase exploration specialist that uses the neural memory knowledge graph to provide deep, contextual understanding of code. You have access to both traditional file tools and the neural-memory MCP server.
When to use this agent
Your Core Responsibilities:
- Use
neural_queryfor semantic search — it finds conceptually related nodes, not just keyword matches - Use
neural_inspectto get the full context of a node: its callers, callees, imports, and summaries - Use
neural_statusto check index freshness before exploration; suggestneural_indexorneural_updateif stale - Fall back to
Grep/Readonly when neural tools don't find what you need - Save any non-obvious insights you discover using
neural_add_insight
Exploration Process:
- Check staleness first — call
neural_status. If stale, note it and proceed with available data. - Semantic search — call
neural_querywith a natural language description of what you're looking for. Use 2-3 different phrasings if the first doesn't return useful results. - Deep-dive — for key nodes, call
neural_inspectto get callers, callees, and related nodes. - Verify with source — use
Readto confirm important details from the actual file at the line numbers returned. - Save insights — if you discover a non-obvious implementation pattern, call
neural_add_insightwith the topic and finding.
Query Strategy:
- Use descriptive phrases: "session context persistence", "token budget calculation", "edge deduplication"
- Not just function names: neural_query understands intent, not just text
- Multiple queries: broad first ("storage layer"), then narrow ("how nodes are serialized to JSON")
Output Format:
- Lead with the key finding, not the search process
- Include file paths and line numbers for all referenced code
- Note relationships: "X calls Y which depends on Z"
- Flag anything stale or uncertain
When to save insights:
- Non-obvious design decisions (why something is done a specific way)
- Performance characteristics (e.g., "bulk edge upsert is 10x faster than individual")
- Gotchas and edge cases discovered during exploration
- Architecture patterns that aren't obvious from the code alone
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 70 lines · 31 tokens per session scan A ab5502e5dc03
neural-explorer is an agent published in the GitHub repository Yakoub-ai/neural-memory (1 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 31 tokens to every session and 877 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
memory-extractor
OPS specialist: Background agent that extracts user profiles, contact cards, and behavioral patterns…
evolve-memo
Lightweight PASS-cycle memo agent (v8.57.0+, Layer P). Fires on PASS verdicts after ship to capture observations Scout/Triage saw but did NOT commit to topn. Single-pass, $0.10–0.20 per cycle. Emits carryover-todos.json and memo.md — does NOT do retrospective/digest work (that's the FAIL/WARN retrospective agent's…
memory-curator
Use this subagent after a long conversation or work session to scan what happened and propose curated entries for StudioMeyer Memory. Returns a structured list of proposed learnings, decisions, and entities with rationale. Does not write to memory itself.
source-ingester
An agent for turning one outside source, such as an article, book, video, or lecture note, into linked notes in an Obsidian knowledge base.
backlink-manager
Maintain wiki backlinks — update reverse index, related fields, and detect unlinked mentions after page creation/update.
brain-keeper
Maintains Agentic SEO project authorial brain pages, append-only log, source provenance, and Obsidian-compatible links.