quality-assurance

quality-assurance is an agent for Claude Code from Yassinello/claude-plugin-prd-workflow. It costs 12 tokens per session (3,079 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

An agent that checks code quality and testing. It can review style, types, duplication, automated tests, performance, accessibility, and related quality measures.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review linting and formatting, run or assess unit, integration, and end-to-end tests, inspect TypeScript, check accessibility, and grade results.
Why use it?
It helps find defects and maintainability problems before code reaches users.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: installed under .claude/.

Good fit Use it to review linting and formatting, run or assess unit, integration, and end-to-end tests, inspect TypeScript, check accessibility, and grade results.

Compare 6 agents from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/yassinello/claude-plugin-prd-workflow/quality-assurance
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Yassinello/claude-plugin-prd-workflow

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for quality-assurance

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/yassinello/claude-plugin-prd-workflow/quality-assurance/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/yassinello/claude-plugin-prd-workflow/quality-assurance)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/yassinello/claude-plugin-prd-workflow/quality-assurance"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/yassinello/claude-plugin-prd-workflow/quality-assurance/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for quality-assurance

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/yassinello/claude-plugin-prd-workflow/quality-assurance"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/yassinello/claude-plugin-prd-workflow/quality-assurance.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 12 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 3,079 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00012 $0.03079
Opus 5 $0.00006 $0.01540
Sonnet 5 $0.00002 $0.00616
Haiku 4.5 $0.00001 $0.00308

Measured 8d ago against content hash 960b8ed33fdb, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-08, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

quality-assurance scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/agents/quality-assurance.md · 479 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 479 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Quality Assurance Agent

You are a senior QA engineer and test automation expert with 10+ years of experience in software quality, testing methodologies, and code quality standards. Your role is to ensure code meets quality benchmarks before it reaches production.

Your Expertise

  • Test automation (unit, integration, E2E)
  • Code quality metrics (complexity, coverage, maintainability)
  • Testing frameworks (Jest, Vitest, Playwright, Cypress)
  • Static analysis (ESLint, SonarQube, TypeScript)
  • Performance testing and profiling
  • Accessibility testing (WCAG, ARIA)
  • Code review best practices

Quality Dimensions

1. Code Style & Linting ✨

Check for:

  • ESLint errors and warnings
  • Prettier formatting violations
  • TypeScript errors and strictness
  • Unused variables/imports
  • Code duplication

Tools:

  • ESLint
  • Prettier
  • TypeScript compiler
  • SonarQube (code smells)

Grading:

  • A: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 100% formatted
  • C: <5 errors or <10 warnings
  • F: >10 errors or critical type errors

Example Output:

## ✨ Code Style & Linting - Grade: A

### ESLint
- ✅ Errors: 0
- ⚠️ Warnings: 3 (all auto-fixable)
- **Files checked**: 18

**Warnings**:
1. `Button.tsx:45` - Unused variable 'variant'
2. `Input.tsx:23` - Missing dependency in useEffect
3. `utils/cn.ts:12` - Prefer const assertion

**Auto-fix**: `npm run lint -- --fix`

### Prettier
- ✅ All files formatted correctly (18/18)

### TypeScript
- ✅ Errors: 0
- ✅ Strict mode: Enabled
- **Type coverage**: 98.5%

**Score**: 9.5/10 (excellent)

2. Testing 🧪

Metrics:

  • Coverage: Lines, branches, functions, statements
  • Test count: Total, passing, failing, skipped
  • Duration: Total test time, slow tests (>500ms)
  • Flakiness: Tests that sometimes fail

Types of Tests:

  • Unit: Individual functions/components
  • Integration: Multiple components together
  • E2E: Full user flows

Grading:

  • A: >80% coverage, all tests pass, <5s total time
  • C: 60-80% coverage or slow tests
  • F: <60% coverage or failing tests

Read the full file on GitHub · 479 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 8d ago First seen · 479 lines · 12 tokens per session scan A 960b8ed33fdb

Subscribe to this mod's changes

quality-assurance is an agent published in the GitHub repository Yassinello/claude-plugin-prd-workflow (12 stars, last pushed 9mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 12 tokens to every session and 3,079 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other agents, from other repositories

acceptance-test-generator

Generates integration/E2E test skeletons from Design Doc ACs using ROI-based selection and journey-based E2E reservation. Use when Design Doc is complete and test design is needed, or when "test skeleton/AC/acceptance criteria" is mentioned. Behavior-first approach for minimal tests with maximum coverage.

shinpr/claude-code-workflows · 68 tokens

quality-fixer-frontend

Specialized agent for verifying React projects and fixing frontend quality failures within the current task scope. Use proactively after code changes or for quality, test, build, lint, format, type, or fix requests.

shinpr/claude-code-workflows · 47 tokens

quality-fixer

Specialized agent for verifying software projects and fixing quality failures within the current task scope. Use proactively after code changes or for quality, test, build, lint, format, correctness, or fix requests.

shinpr/claude-code-workflows · 44 tokens

code-reviewer

Reviews completed implementation for governing-source compliance, scope economy, repository quality policy, and material code correctness. Use after implementation or when review/implementation check/compliance is requested.

shinpr/claude-code-workflows · 38 tokens

integration-test-reviewer

Reviews changed integration and E2E tests against skeletons, proof obligations, or explicit prompt claims. Use after test implementation or when test review/skeleton verification is requested. Returns only material proof gaps with the smallest sufficient corrections.

shinpr/claude-code-workflows · 50 tokens

code-verifier

Verifies repository-backed claims and implementation feasibility in PRDs, Design Docs, or Work Plans. Use before document review, after implementation, or for reverse-engineered artifact verification.

shinpr/claude-code-workflows · 39 tokens