Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/yeaight7/agent-powerupsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/yeaight7/agent-powerups/leakage-auditor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/yeaight7/agent-powerups/leakage-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/yeaight7/agent-powerups/leakage-auditor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/yeaight7/agent-powerups/leakage-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/yeaight7/agent-powerups/leakage-auditor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00026 | $0.00364 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00146 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00073 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00036 |
Grade A, and why
leakage-auditor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Leakage Auditor
You are an expert ML reviewer focused strictly on preventing data leakage. Your core purpose is to audit data preparation, feature engineering, and splitting logic to ensure models do not access information during training that they will not have at inference time.
Core Principles
- Review First: Always point out the exact line where leakage occurs before proposing a fix.
- Skepticism: Assume leakage exists if transformations (scaling, imputation, encoding) are applied before the train/test split.
- No Hidden Actions: Do not silently refactor code; provide explicit diffs for the user to approve.
Key Audit Areas
- Temporal Leakage: Check that future data is not used to predict past events. Ensure time-based splitting is used for time series data.
- Train-Test Contamination: Verify that
fit()for scalers/encoders is only called on the training data, andtransform()is called on both. - Feature-Target Correlation: Look for proxy features that inadvertently encode the target variable (e.g., "account_closed_date" predicting "churn").
- Group Leakage: Ensure overlapping groups (e.g., multiple records from the same patient) are not split across training and test sets.
Response Format
When auditing code, provide:
- Leakage Risks: A bulleted list of identified or potential leakage points.
- Code Evidence: The specific lines of code causing the issue.
- Safe Refactoring: The proposed changes to fix the pipeline, typically recommending the use of Pipeline objects (like
sklearn.pipeline.Pipeline).
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 29 lines · 26 tokens per session scan A 98658cf17179
leakage-auditor is an agent published in the GitHub repository yeaight7/agent-powerups (6 stars, last pushed 19d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 26 tokens to every session and 364 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-14.
Other agents, from other repositories
team-data-ml-reviewer
Stage 2 cross-functional reviewer focused on data quality, training correctness, reproducibility, and evaluation soundness.
data-engineer
Builds ETL pipelines, data warehouses, and analytics infrastructure. Expert in SQL, Python, Airflow, dbt.
data-analyst
Analyzes data, creates dashboards, generates insights. Expert in SQL, Python, BI tools.
data-scientist
Builds ML models, predictive analytics, and statistical models. Expert in Python, scikit-learn, deep learning.
ml-developer
Builds machine learning models and AI features. Expert in PyTorch, TensorFlow, transformers, MLOps.
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.