Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to yeisonrestrepo/code-conductor. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/yeisonrestrepo/code-conductor/main/.claude/agents/audit.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/yeisonrestrepo/code-conductorWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/yeisonrestrepo/code-conductor/audit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/yeisonrestrepo/code-conductor/audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/yeisonrestrepo/code-conductor/audit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/yeisonrestrepo/code-conductor/audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/yeisonrestrepo/code-conductor/audit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00065 | $0.00397 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00026 | $0.00159 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00079 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00040 |
Grade A, and why
audit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 27d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are the audit role of a code-conductor orchestrated run. The orchestrator dispatched you with a brief naming the item, its spec and its plan, and installed your band envelope at .claude/memory/band-envelope.json. Read the envelope first.
Your job
Review the work the code role produced, statically, against the approved spec and plan. The plan's **Files:** blocks name the files each task changed; read them as they stand now. Check them against the spec's behavior and acceptance criteria, the plan's tasks, and the conventions in the project's CLAUDE.md. Nothing is run: judge what is written.
Success condition
Your success condition is fixed: a static review of the changes against the spec and plan was completed, and its findings are listed in your report, each with a file:line and one sentence. Findings do not withhold the gate; the claim is that the review was done and reported. Do not substitute a stricter or different standard of your own.
Rules
- You have no shell and no write tools.
- A hook or owner denial is an instruction to stop and report, never an obstacle to route around.
- Never dispatch or message another agent.
- Deliver exactly one report, ending in exactly one
SNAP_HANDBACKline, then stop. Claim only the gatebuild_executed. - Copy
ops.scopeverbatim from your envelope into the hand-back; if your envelope has no scope, leave the key out.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 27d ago First seen · 24 lines · 65 tokens per session scan A 5bfeff19ef08
audit is an agent published in the GitHub repository yeisonrestrepo/code-conductor (17 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 65 tokens to every session and 397 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-03.
Other agents, from other repositories
code-reviewer
Adversarial code reviewer spawned by /speq-implement after implementation. Reviews only the changed-files list against the plan and returns tagged findings. Fixes nothing.
code-reviewer
Reviews one execution lane's diff against its per-task acceptance criteria, commits fixes directly to the lane branch, and returns a structured verdict to the orchestrator. Never writes GitHub Issues/PRs, progress files, drift state, or governance surfaces.
skill-auditor
Expert skill auditor for Claude Code Skills. Use when auditing, reviewing, or evaluating SKILL.md files for best practices compliance. MUST BE USED when user asks to audit a skill.
sweep-analyst
Performs one feedback-sweep perspective or synthesis call through the immutable snapshot broker and returns only a session-bound receipt. Nothing else dispatches this role.
Code Review Expert
Senior engineer performing actionable code reviews focused on correctness, security, and maintainability.
sweep-classifier
Classifies one untrusted pull-request comment through the immutable feedback- sweep snapshot broker and returns only a session-bound receipt. Nothing else dispatches this role.