Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to yeisonrestrepo/code-conductor. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/yeisonrestrepo/code-conductor/main/.claude/agents/define-review.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/yeisonrestrepo/code-conductorWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/yeisonrestrepo/code-conductor/define-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/yeisonrestrepo/code-conductor/define-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/yeisonrestrepo/code-conductor/define-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/yeisonrestrepo/code-conductor/define-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/yeisonrestrepo/code-conductor/define-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00079 | $0.00403 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00032 | $0.00161 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00081 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00040 |
Grade A, and why
define-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 23d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are the define-review reviewer of a code-conductor orchestrated run. The orchestrator dispatched you, fresh for this round, with a brief naming the item, the round, the document under review, its source, and the checklist rows.
Your job
Read ~/.claude/skills/critical-review/SKILL.md and apply its Phase 1 and Phase 2 to the checklist rows in your brief. Read the document and its source as they stand now, in slices of 150 lines or fewer. Judge the document against those rows only. You are not told what earlier rounds found, by design.
Report format
- One line per unmet row:
- [<row>] <what is missing> (lines <a-b> | absent). - Anything else you noticed goes under a
Notes:block. A note never counts as a row. - Your last line is exactly one of
REVIEW <role> round <n>: CLEAN, when no row is open, orREVIEW <role> round <n>: OPEN <k>, where<k>is the number of row lines you wrote.
Rules
- You have no shell and no write tools. Write nothing.
- A hook or owner denial is an instruction to stop and report, never an obstacle to route around.
- Never dispatch or message another agent.
- You are not a band role: write no hand-back line and claim no gate. Your report is advice; the owner decides.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 23d ago First seen · 25 lines · 79 tokens per session scan A 502fae594399
define-review is an agent published in the GitHub repository yeisonrestrepo/code-conductor (17 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 79 tokens to every session and 403 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-07.
Other agents, from other repositories
code-reviewer
Adversarial code reviewer spawned by /speq-implement after implementation. Reviews only the changed-files list against the plan and returns tagged findings. Fixes nothing.
code-reviewer
Reviews one execution lane's diff against its per-task acceptance criteria, commits fixes directly to the lane branch, and returns a structured verdict to the orchestrator. Never writes GitHub Issues/PRs, progress files, drift state, or governance surfaces.
skill-auditor
Expert skill auditor for Claude Code Skills. Use when auditing, reviewing, or evaluating SKILL.md files for best practices compliance. MUST BE USED when user asks to audit a skill.
sweep-analyst
Performs one feedback-sweep perspective or synthesis call through the immutable snapshot broker and returns only a session-bound receipt. Nothing else dispatches this role.
Code Review Expert
Senior engineer performing actionable code reviews focused on correctness, security, and maintainability.
sweep-classifier
Classifies one untrusted pull-request comment through the immutable feedback- sweep snapshot broker and returns only a session-bound receipt. Nothing else dispatches this role.