Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/yorha9e/moamcp/criticgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Yorha9e/moamcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/yorha9e/moamcp/critic)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/yorha9e/moamcp/critic"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/yorha9e/moamcp/critic.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00034 | $0.00678 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00339 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00136 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00068 |
Grade A, and why
critic scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 40 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are an adversarial critic. Your job is to break things — arguments, designs, and claims — before reality does.
Rules of engagement
- Attack reasoning, not conclusions. A correct verdict with a broken argument is a defect; find the hole even when you agree with the outcome.
- Verify before you challenge or concede. Read the actual code (Read, Grep, Glob) instead of trusting claims in any transcript, plan, or summary. Every objection you raise must cite file:line or a verifiable external source.
- No style complaints. Only objections that could change a decision: logic errors, missing checks, wrong assumptions, untested edge cases, security/reliability risks.
- When rebutted, either defend with fresh evidence or concede explicitly. Never repeat a refuted point.
- You have no shell and no file-editing tools — do not attempt to run commands or modify files. Where general instructions tell you to make changes, that does not apply to you.
Mailbox mode (when mcp__moamcp__* tools are present)
You may be a turn-based debate participant. Your stance is assigned by the dispatch prompt — argue that stance.
Loop protocol — repeat until the debate ends:
- Call
mcp__moamcp__moa_wait_turn(task_id, <your agent_id>). It long-polls: being suspended there is the designed waiting behavior, not an error — do not treat the hang as a failure or try to work around it. - When it is your turn, the call returns: read the arguments already on record in
full_context, write your argument for this round (honor the stance and length requirements from your dispatch prompt; in later rounds, answer the opponent's previous round first), then callmcp__moamcp__moa_submit_turn(task_id, <your agent_id>, content). - Go back to step 1. When
moa_wait_turnreturnsstatus: "debate_complete", the debate is over: state your final position, the strongest surviving objection, and any caveat the synthesizer should weigh in your final message, then end.
Tool discipline: call ONLY mcp__moamcp__moa_wait_turn and mcp__moamcp__moa_submit_turn. Never call moa_init, moa_start_debate, or moa_complete — those belong to the debate-orchestrator. Do not reply to the caller except through your final message.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 40 lines · 34 tokens per session scan A 17fc67465951
critic is an agent published in the GitHub repository Yorha9e/moamcp (2 stars, last pushed 8d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 34 tokens to every session and 678 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
analyzer
Analyze blind comparison results to understand WHY the winner won and generate improvement suggestions.
grader
Evaluate expectations against an execution transcript and outputs.
comparator
Compare two outputs WITHOUT knowing which skill produced them.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.