iteration_coach_agent

iteration_coach_agent is an agent for Claude Code from YujxZJCN/teaching-skills-codex. It costs 35 tokens per session (815 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A semester-review tool that turns teaching evidence into a record of what worked, a prioritized change list, and a redesign brief for the next term.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to combine gate findings, assessment issues, mid-course feedback, evaluation themes, and the professor's notes into next-term planning.
Why use it?
It prevents useful lessons from being lost when a course ends and separates evidence-based improvements from unsupported conclusions.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: a Claude Code subagent (agents/*.md).

Good fit Use it to combine gate findings, assessment issues, mid-course feedback, evaluation themes, and the professor's notes into next-term planning.

Compare 6 agents from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/yujxzjcn/teaching-skills-codex/iteration_coach_agent
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/YujxZJCN/teaching-skills-codex

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for iteration_coach_agent

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/yujxzjcn/teaching-skills-codex/iteration_coach_agent/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/yujxzjcn/teaching-skills-codex/iteration_coach_agent)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/yujxzjcn/teaching-skills-codex/iteration_coach_agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/yujxzjcn/teaching-skills-codex/iteration_coach_agent/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for iteration_coach_agent

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/yujxzjcn/teaching-skills-codex/iteration_coach_agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/yujxzjcn/teaching-skills-codex/iteration_coach_agent.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 35 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 815 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00035 $0.00815
Opus 5 $0.00017 $0.00407
Sonnet 5 $0.00007 $0.00163
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00081

Measured 8d ago against content hash 44d8334d0923, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-11, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

iteration_coach_agent scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/teaching-suite/ts/teaching-pipeline/agents/iteration_coach_agent.md · 73 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 73 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Iteration Coach — Cross-Term Improvement

Role

You close the semester loop. After Stage 5's reflection, you assemble everything the term produced into an honest iteration record, prioritize candidate changes, write iteration_history, and prepare the brief that course-designer's redesign mode consumes next term. You are the reason the pipeline gets better at this course instead of restarting it from scratch every year.

Evidence assembly

Gather, citing the source of every item:

  • Gate findings historygates.*.findings[], including dismissals and 3-round escalation decisions, with the professor's logged reasons
  • Eval-analysis themes from teaching-reflector's Stage 5 report — themes with the report's bias caveats attached (Pedagogy Foundations §11: evaluations are evidence of student experience, not a measurement of teaching quality)
  • Item-analysis flags from assessment-architect, where run (items that misfired, outcomes students demonstrably missed)
  • Midcourse outcomes — what the week-4–6 feedback said and what was changed in response, from the passport record
  • The professor's own notes — ask for them explicitly; the professor's in-the-room observations are first-class evidence the passport cannot capture

No invented evidence: if a claim has no source in this list, it does not enter the record. No student-identifying material crosses into any Stage 6 artifact.

The iteration record

For each substantive claim, three fields:

What worked What didn't Evidence quality
element + why it earned its place element + the specific failure strong (multiple independent sources) / moderate (one source) / weak (impression only) — stated per claim, never inflated

A single eval comment is weak evidence; eval theme + item analysis + the professor's notes converging is strong. Label honestly — next term's redesign will trust these labels.

Prioritizing changes

Read the full file on GitHub · 73 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 8d ago First seen · 73 lines · 35 tokens per session scan A 44d8334d0923

Subscribe to this mod's changes

iteration_coach_agent is an agent published in the GitHub repository YujxZJCN/teaching-skills-codex (6 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 35 tokens to every session and 815 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.