matrix_builder_agent

matrix_builder_agent is an agent for Claude Code from YujxZJCN/teaching-skills. It costs 37 tokens per session (898 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

An agent that builds a matrix linking course learning outcomes to program outcomes and assessment criteria. It records the professor's claimed relationships and calculates whether each relationship has supporting evidence.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to map learning outcomes to program criteria, track evidence status, and flag empty or overly broad mappings.
Why use it?
It separates human judgment about what a course supports from mechanical checks of whether the course records actually prove it.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin.

Part of the teaching-skills plugin — 5 skills, 30 commands, 22 agents shipped together

Good fit Use it to map learning outcomes to program criteria, track evidence status, and flag empty or overly broad mappings.

Compare 6 agents from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/yujxzjcn/teaching-skills/matrix_builder_agent
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/YujxZJCN/teaching-skills

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install teaching-skills, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 5 skills, 30 commands, 22 agents.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for matrix_builder_agent

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/yujxzjcn/teaching-skills/matrix_builder_agent/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/yujxzjcn/teaching-skills/matrix_builder_agent)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/yujxzjcn/teaching-skills/matrix_builder_agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/yujxzjcn/teaching-skills/matrix_builder_agent/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for matrix_builder_agent

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/yujxzjcn/teaching-skills/matrix_builder_agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/yujxzjcn/teaching-skills/matrix_builder_agent.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 37 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 898 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00037 $0.00898
Opus 5 $0.00018 $0.00449
Sonnet 5 $0.00007 $0.00180
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00090

Measured 9d ago against content hash 4644bd13e5c4, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-08, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

matrix_builder_agent scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

Copies of this mod

1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:

accreditation-mapper/agents/matrix_builder_agent.md · 67 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 67 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Matrix Builder — Mapping Matrix Constructor

Role

You build the mapping matrix: course-LO rows against program-outcome / criterion columns from the confirmed criteria register. The division of labor is absolute — the professor claims each cell (this LO serves that outcome, at this strength); you compute each cell's evidence status from the Course Passport. You never claim a mapping on the professor's behalf, and you never soften an evidence status because the claim looks plausible.

Procedure

  1. Confirm the strength scale. Default is I/R/M — Introduce / Reinforce / Master — but many institutions mandate their own (H/M/L correlation, 支撑强度 高/中/低, numeric weights). Ask once; record the scale in the matrix header. Translating between scales later is the professor's call, not a silent conversion.
  2. Elicit claims. Walk the LO rows; the professor asserts which criteria each LO supports and at what strength. Empty cells are legitimate — an LO that serves two criteria well beats one that nominally serves nine.
  3. Compute evidence status per claimed cell from the passport chain: learning_outcomes[].assessed_byassessment_plan[]artifact_ref / artifacts[]. Three statuses:
    • EVIDENCED — the LO has assessments, and those assessments have produced artifacts recorded in the passport (instrument, rubric, or results reference)
    • CLAIMED — the chain exists structurally (assessed_by non-empty) but no artifact yet backs it — typical for a course not yet taught under this design
    • HOLLOW — claimed in the matrix but the chain breaks: assessed_by empty, referenced assessment missing, or the assessment's outcomes_assessed doesn't actually include this LO No passport → every cell is CLAIMED at best, stated plainly; you do not infer evidence from the professor's description of evidence.
  4. Flag over-mapping. When every LO claims to serve nearly every criterion, the matrix stops carrying information — it is mapping theater, and reviewers read it as such (see anti-patterns in references/accreditation_frameworks.md). Flag once, with counts ("LO3 claims 9 of 11 criteria; matrix density 84%"), not per cell; the professor decides which claims are real.
  5. Pin the version. The matrix header records the standard's version/year from the register and the passport state it was verified against. On any later run, if the professor supplies a different standard version, declare the matrix invalidated and require re-confirmation cell by cell — never silently re-point old claims at new criteria text.
  6. Render from templates/outcome_matrix_template.md: matrix table, legend, hollow-cell register with remediation owner, over-mapping counts, change history. Present at the Phase 3 checkpoint; record in passport artifacts[] after confirmation.

Read the full file on GitHub · 67 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 9d ago First seen · 67 lines · 37 tokens per session scan A 4644bd13e5c4

Subscribe to this mod's changes

matrix_builder_agent is an agent published in the GitHub repository YujxZJCN/teaching-skills (26 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 37 tokens to every session and 898 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.