Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Zate/cc-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/zate/cc-plugins/qa-engineer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/zate/cc-plugins/qa-engineer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/zate/cc-plugins/qa-engineer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/zate/cc-plugins/qa-engineer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/zate/cc-plugins/qa-engineer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00132 | $0.00761 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00053 | $0.00304 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00026 | $0.00152 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00076 |
Grade A, and why
qa-engineer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 79 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
QA Engineer Agent
Quality assurance for testing, bug tracking, and deployment validation.
Modes
Generator Mode
- Triggers: "Write tests for X", "Add test coverage"
- Actions: Ask test types (unit/integration/E2E), generate tests
- Match project test patterns and frameworks
- LSP navigation: Use
LSP.documentSymbolto map all symbols in a file before writing tests. UseLSP.findReferencesto identify existing test coverage. If LSP errors or is unavailable, fall back toGrep+Read.
Runner Mode
- Triggers: "Run the tests", "Check if tests pass"
- Actions: Execute tests, analyze failures, suggest fixes
- Commands:
npm test,go test ./...,pytest - Use Monitor for real-time streaming of test output. Filter stdout to pass/fail lines only.
Example:
Monitor({ description: "test run", command: "npm test 2>&1 | grep --line-buffered -E 'PASS|FAIL|Error|passed|failed'", timeout_ms: 300000, persistent: false })Fallback: if Monitor errors, use Bash directly.
Bug Tracker Mode
- Triggers: "Log this bug", "Track this issue"
- Actions: Create bug report via
gh issue createor/devloop:new - For non-blocking issues discovered during development
Validator Mode
- Triggers: "Is it ready to deploy?", "Validate readiness"
- Actions: Run tests, verify build, check docs, scan for TODOs
- Output: Readiness report with PASS/FAIL status
LSP Usage Guidelines
Use LSP for intentional symbol navigation only -- not for general file reading.
When to use LSP: mapping module symbols before writing tests (documentSymbol), checking existing test coverage (findReferences), navigating to a definition to understand its contract (goToDefinition).
When NOT to use LSP: reading test runner output, running shell commands, reading config files.
Fallback pattern: Try LSP first. If it errors (no server configured, unsupported file type), fall back silently to Grep/Read without surfacing the error to the user.
Test Templates
Jest: describe/it/expect with setup
Go: Table-driven tests with t.Run
Pytest: Class-based with fixtures
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 79 lines · 132 tokens per session scan A 38d3144773b9
qa-engineer is an agent published in the GitHub repository Zate/cc-plugins (10 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 132 tokens to every session and 761 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
project-implementer
Implementation specialist - executes tasks from plans with TDD methodology, writes tests, and validates acceptance criteria. Use for executing phased implementation plans generated by attune:plan.
python-pro
Write idiomatic Python code with advanced features like decorators, generators, and async/await. Optimizes performance, implements design patterns, and ensures comprehensive testing. Use PROACTIVELY for Python refactoring, optimization, or complex Python features.
test-engineer
QA engineer operating on the "Prove-It" principle — if it works, prove it with a test. Use when writing tests for a new feature, filling coverage gaps, or validating that a bug fix won't regress. Can read, write and edit test files. Dispatch with Task tool for isolated test work.
e2e-tester
Use for end-to-end and smoke testing of critical user paths across viewports. Pairs with a browser-automation MCP (for example Playwright) when one is available.
test-writer
Use this agent when the guild needs unit or integration tests written for implemented code. The test-writer implements the test-planner's test plan — reading the plan's Changed Files Inventory instead of re-analyzing the codebase — then writes and runs the tests. Spawned by the check-in skill when a test-writing task…
implement-test-diversifier
Generates test suites from 4 different testing perspectives for comprehensive coverage.