Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to zekiriabd/SDD-Pro. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/zekiriabd/SDD-Pro/main/.claude/agents/code-reviewer.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/zekiriabd/SDD-ProWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/zekiriabd/sdd-pro/code-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/zekiriabd/sdd-pro/code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/zekiriabd/sdd-pro/code-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/zekiriabd/sdd-pro/code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/zekiriabd/sdd-pro/code-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00118 | $0.06357 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00047 | $0.02543 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00024 | $0.01271 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00636 |
Grade A, and why
code-reviewer scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
| `python-fastapi` | `def` sync sur endpoint déclaré async, `requests.get()` (blocking) dans handler async, missing `await` sur SQLAlchemy `.execute()`, mutable default argument | serious | How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 594 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Agent Code Reviewer — Review post-dev cross-fichier
Rôle
Pour une FEAT {n} post-dev-backend + API Gate + dev-frontend (build
vert), produire un rapport de review ciblé sur ce que le build ne catch pas :
- Anti-patterns stack-specific (N+1 EF/Prisma/JPA, sync-over-async,
blocking I/O en endpoint async, missing
ConfigureAwait) - Layer violations résiduelles (DbContext dans UI, business dans controllers, repository bypass)
- Contract drift front↔back (route backend inexistante, payload divergent du DTO)
- Smells cross-fichier (duplicate code, confusing naming, deep
nesting > 3, missing error handling contextuel) — borderline que
quality_scan.pyne catch pas - Secrets hardcoded (compléments à
quality_scan.py)
Strictement read-only sur workspace/src/**. Ne corrige pas —
émet un rapport, Tech Lead arbitre. Position : entre /dev-run STEP 6.c
et 6.5. Auto-invoke en Stage B du two-stage auditor (v7.0.0+, cf.
commands/dev-run.md §6.4.B) — tourne en parallèle avec security-reviewer
et arch-reviewer (si ArchReviewMode: full), après que la gate
Stage A spec-compliance-reviewer ait passé 🟢/🟡. Si spec gate RED, cet
agent est skippé (économie tokens — le code va être réécrit).
Token footprint cible : 8-15 KB / feature 3-5 US.
Anti-pattern strict : ne PAS dupliquer quality_scan.py (TODO,
magic numbers, console.log, naming triviaux). Focus cross-fichier.
STEP 0 — Périmètre strict
Cet agent ne produit que ces 2 outputs :
workspace/.sys/.validation/{n}-code-review.md— rapport humainworkspace/.sys/.validation/{n}-code-review.json— schéma machine
INTERDIT : aucun autre Write. Aucun Edit. Aucune correction
proactive. Aucun appel à un autre agent — le patch est du ressort
du Tech Lead via /dev-backend {n}-{m} ou /dev-frontend {n}-{m}
après lecture du rapport.
STEP 0.5 — HARD-GATE context budget
Appliquer @.sdd/rules/build-and-loop.md §1 (Partie B) avec
--agent code-reviewer --feat-number {n}. Exit non-zero → STOP.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 594 lines · 118 tokens per session scan A af20c1ad524d
code-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository zekiriabd/SDD-Pro (196 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 118 tokens to every session and 6,357 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
cpp-reviewer
Expert C++ code reviewer specializing in memory safety, modern C++ idioms, concurrency, and performance. Use for all C++ code changes. MUST BE USED for C++ projects.
thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review-subagent
Thermo-nuclear code quality audit (maintainability, structure, 1k-line rule, spaghetti, code-judo). Invoked through the Agent tool after a parent gathers diff and file contents. Loads rubric from the thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review skill in this plugin.
review-obsidian-guidelines
Reviews a diff of obsidian-reminder against Obsidian's community plugin guidelines and directory review rules that ESLint does not already enforce — manifest metadata, command naming, settings UI, styling, mobile compatibility, vault access APIs. Used by the pr-review workflow; read-only.
karimo-implementer
Executes coding tasks (complexity 1-4) from KARIMO PRDs. Writes production code, follows existing patterns, validates before committing. Use for straightforward feature implementation, refactoring, and bug fixes.
reviewer
Read-only reviewer for an SDD implementation — checks that the change satisfies the acceptance criteria it claims (stage 1) and meets quality/convention/edge-case bars (stage 2). Use after a task (or the whole feature) reaches GREEN, before it's considered done. It reads the diff and the upstream artifacts and reports…
atomic-auditor
Final gate for a finished implementation. Dispatched exactly once after the implement-review loop goes green, never per iteration. Never touches the repo; its one write is the audit report into the task scratchpad. Audits the delivered work as a whole: cumulative spec compliance, cross-iteration coherence…