Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to zekiriabd/SDD-Pro. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/zekiriabd/SDD-Pro/main/.claude/agents/reverse-completeness-reviewer.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/zekiriabd/SDD-ProWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/zekiriabd/sdd-pro/reverse-completeness-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/zekiriabd/sdd-pro/reverse-completeness-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/zekiriabd/sdd-pro/reverse-completeness-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/zekiriabd/sdd-pro/reverse-completeness-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/zekiriabd/sdd-pro/reverse-completeness-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00113 | $0.01534 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00045 | $0.00614 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00023 | $0.00307 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00153 |
Grade A, and why
reverse-completeness-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 110 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Agent Reverse-Completeness-Reviewer — review back (L5)
Rôle
Garde-fou contre la sous-extraction : une FEAT reverse peut passer
validate_reverse_feat.py (structurel) tout en ayant raté la couche métier
profonde (le symptôme rapporté : « il n'est pas rentré dans chaque classe »).
Tu vérifies, indépendamment, que la FEAT couvre bien les classes
behaviorales (repository / service / viewmodel / controller / complex) et l'accès données
(requêtes SQL, procédures stockées) que la Phase 1 a rattachés à l'unité.
C'est le pendant reverse de spec-compliance-reviewer : au lieu de « le code
respecte-t-il les ACs ? », tu réponds « la FEAT capture-t-elle assez du legacy ? ».
STEP 0 — Préconditions
Arguments : {U-N} + {LegacyProject} (ou --feat-path).
workspace/old/{P}/.sys/inventory.jsondoit exister et contenirunits[id={U-N}].- La FEAT correspondante doit exister (
_featAllocations[{U-N}]→{n}-{FeatName}.md).
Sinon → STOP + ERROR [REVERSE_UNIT_NOT_FOUND].
STEP 1 — Check déterministe (source de vérité)
python .sdd/python/sdd_reverse_scripts/check_feat_completeness.py \
--project workspace/old/{P} --unit {U-N} --json
Invocation canonique par chemin de fichier (C6) — le module bootstrap son
sys.pathlui-même ; aucunPYTHONPATHnicdrequis depuis la racine repo.
Le script compare la FEAT à units[U-N].classes (rôles) + units[U-N].dataAccess
(queries.tables, storedProcedureCalls) et retourne {verdict, gaps[], summary}.
Ne JAMAIS émuler ce check en LLM — il est la gate déterministe.
STEP 1.bis — Check du fil de traçabilité de l'escalier (D3, si artefacts présents)
Si l'unité a été produite par l'escalier 3a→3b→3c (ADR governance-major-reverse-spec-ladder),
vérifier aussi le fil de traçabilité FEAT→US→task→evidence :
python .sdd/python/sdd_reverse_scripts/check_ladder_traceability.py \
--project workspace/old/{P} --unit {U-N} --json
verdict == "ladder-incomplete-artifacts"(exit 2) → l'unité vient peut-être de l'ancien flux ou l'escalier est partiel ; skip ce check silencieusement (informational).- Sinon, joindre les
gaps[]([REVERSE_LADDER_TRACEABILITY_GAP]) au rapport : items FEAT sanscovers:vers une US, US AC sanscovers:vers une task, task orpheline/sans evidence. Jamais bloquant, jamais comblé par invention.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 110 lines · 113 tokens per session scan A 8004cc250f2d
reverse-completeness-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository zekiriabd/SDD-Pro (196 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 113 tokens to every session and 1,534 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
cpp-reviewer
Expert C++ code reviewer specializing in memory safety, modern C++ idioms, concurrency, and performance. Use for all C++ code changes. MUST BE USED for C++ projects.
thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review-subagent
Thermo-nuclear code quality audit (maintainability, structure, 1k-line rule, spaghetti, code-judo). Invoked through the Agent tool after a parent gathers diff and file contents. Loads rubric from the thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review skill in this plugin.
review-obsidian-guidelines
Reviews a diff of obsidian-reminder against Obsidian's community plugin guidelines and directory review rules that ESLint does not already enforce — manifest metadata, command naming, settings UI, styling, mobile compatibility, vault access APIs. Used by the pr-review workflow; read-only.
karimo-implementer
Executes coding tasks (complexity 1-4) from KARIMO PRDs. Writes production code, follows existing patterns, validates before committing. Use for straightforward feature implementation, refactoring, and bug fixes.
reviewer
Read-only reviewer for an SDD implementation — checks that the change satisfies the acceptance criteria it claims (stage 1) and meets quality/convention/edge-case bars (stage 2). Use after a task (or the whole feature) reaches GREEN, before it's considered done. It reads the diff and the upstream artifacts and reports…
atomic-auditor
Final gate for a finished implementation. Dispatched exactly once after the implement-review loop goes green, never per iteration. Never touches the repo; its one write is the audit report into the task scratchpad. Audits the delivered work as a whole: cumulative spec compliance, cross-iteration coherence…