SDD-Pro: Agent for Claude Code

.claude/agents/spec-compliance-reviewer.md

spec-compliance-reviewer is an agent for Claude Code from zekiriabd/SDD-Pro. It costs 104 tokens per session (5,398 once invoked), scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

A code-checking agent that independently compares each acceptance criterion—the condition a feature must meet—with the code itself. It records whether each criterion is proven, uncertain, or missing, with file and line references.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it after backend and frontend work to check every requirement in a feature’s user stories. It produces Markdown and JSON compliance reports.
Why use it?
It avoids relying on a developer’s summary, which may claim a requirement is complete when the code does not show it. Missing proof is flagged for review before other audits continue.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: installed under .claude/. Also seen: model in frontmatter; mentions CLAUDE.md.

This is zekiriabd/SDD-Pro's own configuration. It tells Claude Code how to work on SDD-Pro itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything SDD-Pro configures →

Needs its repository: it runs a file that does not travel with it, so clone the repository first. The line is python .sdd/python/sdd_scripts/validate_spec_compliance.py --feat {n}.

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to zekiriabd/SDD-Pro. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/zekiriabd/SDD-Pro/main/.claude/agents/spec-compliance-reviewer.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/zekiriabd/SDD-Pro

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for spec-compliance-reviewer

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/zekiriabd/sdd-pro/spec-compliance-reviewer/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/zekiriabd/sdd-pro/spec-compliance-reviewer)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/zekiriabd/sdd-pro/spec-compliance-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/zekiriabd/sdd-pro/spec-compliance-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for spec-compliance-reviewer

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/zekiriabd/sdd-pro/spec-compliance-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/zekiriabd/sdd-pro/spec-compliance-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 104 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 5,398 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00104 $0.05398
Opus 5 $0.00052 $0.02699
Sonnet 5 $0.00021 $0.01080
Haiku 4.5 $0.00010 $0.00540

Measured 10d ago against content hash c5be2358033d, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-10, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

spec-compliance-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/agents/spec-compliance-reviewer.md · 498 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 498 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Agent Spec Compliance Reviewer — Vérification AC-par-AC indépendante

Rôle

Pour une FEAT {n} dont les phases dev-backend + API Gate + dev-frontend sont terminées (build vert), re-lire le code matérialisé et vérifier pour chaque AC de chaque US qu'il existe une preuve concrète d'implémentation dans le code.

Principe load-bearing — "Do not trust the report" (pattern hérité de superpowers v5.1) :

  • L'agent ignore le résumé dev-* (qui dit toujours "AC-3 implémenté ✓")
  • L'agent lit le code lui-même et cherche la preuve (file:line)
  • En cas de doute, l'agent biaise vers ❌ not-found, jamais vers ✅ verified-on-faith
  • Une approbation ✅ verified requiert un pointer file:start-end explicite — sinon c'est ❌ not-found

Position dans le pipeline : Stage A gate du two-stage auditor de /dev-run STEP 6.4 (cf. commands/dev-run.md §6.4.A). Tourne SEUL avant les autres reviewers — pattern emprunt superpowers v5.1. Si verdict 🔴 RED, les 3 autres auditors (code-reviewer, security-reviewer, arch-reviewer) sont skippés (économie ~3 invocations Sonnet 4.6). Si 🟢/🟡, Stage B (batch parallèle 3 reviewers) tourne après. Skip conditionnel via phase_planner.py selon SpecComplianceMode. Fallback legacy parallèle 4-batch disponible via AuditorBatchMode: legacy-parallel (Project Config) ou flag CLI --legacy-auditor-parallel sur /dev-run.

Strictement read-only sur workspace/src/** et workspace/us/**. Ne corrige pas, ne re-Read pas le rapport des autres agents — émet son rapport indépendant.

Token footprint cible : 8-15 KB par FEAT de 3-5 US (Sonnet 4.6, sélectif via plans v2 + lecture ciblée par AC).

Couvre le gap que ni code-reviewer (focus qualité) ni validate_plan.py (vérifie ACs au niveau plan, pas au niveau code matérialisé) ne couvrent : AC déclarée dans US, file planifié, mais code matérialisé qui n'implémente pas l'AC (oubli silencieux de dev-* que build_loop ne catch pas car le build est vert).

Read the full file on GitHub · 498 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 10d ago First seen · 498 lines · 104 tokens per session scan A c5be2358033d

Subscribe to this mod's changes

spec-compliance-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository zekiriabd/SDD-Pro (193 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 104 tokens to every session and 5,398 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other agents, from other repositories

reviewer

Read-only reviewer for an SDD implementation — checks that the change satisfies the acceptance criteria it claims (stage 1) and meets quality/convention/edge-case bars (stage 2). Use after a task (or the whole feature) reaches GREEN, before it's considered done. It reads the diff and the upstream artifacts and reports…

genkovich/sdd · 81 tokens

atomic-auditor

Final gate for a finished implementation. Dispatched exactly once after the implement-review loop goes green, never per iteration. Never touches the repo; its one write is the audit report into the task scratchpad. Audits the delivered work as a whole: cumulative spec compliance, cross-iteration coherence…

damusix/atomic-claude · 169 tokens

bt6-pr-auditor

Reviews one pull request in a BT6 codebase for correctness, research integrity, security, verification quality, and merge readiness.

elder-plinius/T3MP3ST · 32 tokens

Reviewer

Mandatory fast reviewer: validates every agent delegation output before acceptance. Checks acceptance criteria, file partitions, regressions, type safety, security basics.

monkilabs/opencastle · 30 tokens

security-auditor

Use this agent when reviewing local code changes or pull requests to identify security vulnerabilities and risks. This agent should be invoked proactively after completing security-sensitive changes or before merging any PR.

NeoLabHQ/context-engineering-kit · 40 tokens

reviewer-architecture

Use this agent for architecture-focused code review. Evaluates implementation against the plan's architectural decisions, checks separation of concerns, pattern consistency, and proper use of existing abstractions. Spawned in parallel with other reviewers when a review task is dispatched.

HirogaKatageri/hirokata · 56 tokens