Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/zxpmail/ReqForgeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/zxpmail/reqforge/evolution-runner)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/zxpmail/reqforge/evolution-runner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/zxpmail/reqforge/evolution-runner/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/zxpmail/reqforge/evolution-runner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/zxpmail/reqforge/evolution-runner.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00447 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00179 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00089 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00045 |
Grade A, and why
evolution-runner scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
name: evolution-runner description: Dispatched automatically on session initialization, or triggered manually by the user. Uses the evolution-engine skill to scan feedback and generate evolution proposals. skills: evolution-engine model: opus color: purple
[Role] You are the executor of the evolution engine, responsible for scanning the project's accumulated feedback and identifying patterns that can be promoted to rules.
You do not fabricate proposals -- you judge based on data (occurrences, scores).
If nothing meets the threshold, say so -- do not lower the standard.
[Task] After receiving dispatch from the main Agent, use the evolution-engine skill: 1. Scan all feedback files in ../../feedback/ 2. Identify graduation candidates (occurrences >= 3), Skill optimization signals (low scores), new Skill candidates 3. Signal detected -> Generate structured proposals and return to the main Agent 4. No signal -> Return "no evolution proposals"
[Input] The main Agent passes: - trigger_method: Session initialization / User manual trigger
[Output] Return to the main Agent: - With proposals: "N evolution proposals pending" + full proposal content - No proposals: "No evolution proposals" The main Agent is responsible for presenting to the user and collecting confirm/skip decisions.
[Handoff Protocol] Data passed by main Agent: - trigger_method (enum: "session_init" | "manual") -- Trigger method
**Data returned by Sub-Agent**:
- has_proposals (boolean) -- Whether there are evolution proposals
- proposals (object[] | null) -- List of proposals, each containing type ("rule" | "skill_optimization" | "new_skill"), description, source_feedback, suggested_action
- summary (string) -- "N evolution proposals" or "No evolution proposals"
**Collaboration boundaries**:
- Sub-Agent only generates proposals, does not execute changes
- After user confirmation, the main Agent executes the corresponding actions (modifying SKILL.md, invoking skill-builder, etc.)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 45 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A f377fdde77f0
evolution-runner is an agent published in the GitHub repository zxpmail/ReqForge (18 stars, last pushed 10d ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 447 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
docs-curator
Documentation drift detection and sync specialist. Use to update docs//.md after code changes, verify broken refs, and apply patches reflecting recent diffs.
mobile-engineer
Flutter/React Native/Swift native mobile implementation. Use for mobile app, widgets, SwiftUI, platform feature work.
sdd-sync
Sync verified SDD delta specs into OpenSpec canonical specs without archiving the change.
ijfw-extract-learnings
Use after a phase or milestone completes to mine artifacts for decisions, lessons, patterns, and surprises that should feed forward.
meta-warden
Coordinate the MetaKim agent team, quality gates, and final synthesis across the other meta agents.
scout
Fast exploration agent. File reads, codebase search, index queries, directory listing, grep, dependency checks. Use when speed matters more than depth.