Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/actionbook/rust-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/actionbook/rust-skills/unsafe-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/actionbook/rust-skills/unsafe-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/actionbook/rust-skills/unsafe-review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00650 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00325 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00130 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00065 |
Grade A, and why
unsafe-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 135 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 3df37c769440
unsafe-review is a command published in the GitHub repository actionbook/rust-skills (1,443 stars, last pushed 16d ago), with no licence file. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 650 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
rust-review
Review the current Rust diff (or specified files/PR) for idiomatic Rust patterns and hexagonal-architecture compliance, in one pass.
tidy
Refactor and tidy OCaml code to be more idiomatic and maintainable.
cargo-clippy
Command "cargo-clippy" from olorehq/olore, covering cargo-clippy(1), name, description and see also.
review-rust
Focused Rust/Tauri backend review with rust-backend-architect (Primary Owner).
rust-critique
Deep code critique — read the target Rust code and apply the full review process. Evaluates soundness, ownership, error handling, type design, async correctness, performance, and architecture. Think like a senior Rust engineer giving honest feedback.
rust-harden
Harden Rust code — replace unwrap with proper error handling, add safety comments to unsafe blocks, enable overflow checks, validate inputs at boundaries. The defensive hardening pass.