ECC is a toolkit that organizes and improves how coding agents work through skills, memory, security checks, research practices, and related extensions. It is for developers using agents such as Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, and Cursor.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/affaan-m/ecc/rust-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/affaan-m/ECCWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/affaan-m/ecc/rust-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/affaan-m/ecc/rust-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/affaan-m/ecc/rust-review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00485 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00243 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00097 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00049 |
Grade A, and why
rust-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
7 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:
- rust-review — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- rust-review — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- rust-review — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- rust-review — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- rust-review — 95% identical, 2 lines differ
- rust-review — 91% identical, 2 lines differ
- rust-review — 91% identical, 2 lines differ
What it actually says
Rust Review Command
Review Rust code for idiomatic patterns and best practices: $ARGUMENTS
Your Task
- Analyze Rust code for idioms and patterns
- Check ownership - borrowing, lifetimes, unnecessary clones
- Review error handling - proper
?propagation, no unwrap in production - Verify safety - unsafe usage, injection, secrets
Review Checklist
Safety (CRITICAL)
- No unchecked
unwrap()/expect()in production paths -
unsafeblocks have// SAFETY:comments - No SQL/command injection
- No hardcoded secrets
Ownership (HIGH)
- No unnecessary
.clone()to satisfy borrow checker -
&strpreferred overStringin function parameters -
&[T]preferred overVec<T>in function parameters - No excessive lifetime annotations where elision works
Error Handling (HIGH)
- Errors propagated with
?; use.context()inanyhow/eyreapplication code - No silenced errors (
let _ = result;) -
thiserrorfor library errors,anyhowfor applications
Concurrency (HIGH)
- No blocking in async context
- Bounded channels preferred
-
Mutexpoisoning handled -
Send/Syncbounds correct
Code Quality (MEDIUM)
- Functions under 50 lines
- No deep nesting (>4 levels)
- Exhaustive matching on business enums
- Clippy warnings addressed
Report Format
CRITICAL Issues
- [file:line] Issue description Suggestion: How to fix
HIGH Issues
- [file:line] Issue description Suggestion: How to fix
MEDIUM Issues
- [file:line] Issue description Suggestion: How to fix
TIP: Run cargo clippy -- -D warnings and cargo fmt --check for automated checks.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 66 lines · 12 tokens per session scan A e768b36b24aa
rust-review is a command published in the GitHub repository affaan-m/ECC (248,541 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 12 tokens to every session and 485 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other commands, from other repositories
awesome-chatgpt
Search awesome-ChatGPT-repositories for open-source GitHub repositories related to ChatGPT and LLMs.
test
Generate comprehensive tests.
init
Scaffold a new MindBase project (v2 layout). Usage: /mb:init [template] [-- mission ...].
commit
智能生成 Git 提交信息并提交.
pr
Handle the full workflow from current branch state to an open, CI-monitored pull request.
doctor.es
Diagnostica problemas de inferencia LLM en Mac: asiai doctor verifica el estado de los motores, conflictos de puertos, carga de modelos y estado de la GPU.