Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/mnemehq/mneme/reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/MnemeHQ/mnemeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/mnemehq/mneme/review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/mnemehq/mneme/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/mnemehq/mneme/review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00250 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00125 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00001 | $0.00050 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00025 |
Grade A, and why
review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- mneme-review — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
What it actually says
Run git diff to capture pending changes, then for each modified file
check the new content against project memory.
Steps:
- Use Bash:
git diff --name-onlyto list modified files. - For each modified file, use Bash:
git show :0:<file>or read the file directly to get the current content. - Run
mneme checkfor each file, using a descriptive--querythat names the file's domain (not just its path):
mneme check \
--memory .mneme/project_memory.json \
--input <file> \
--query "<domain description for this file>" \
--mode strict
- Aggregate verdicts and report:
- Files that PASS
- Files with violations — include decision id and triggered rule
Note on retrieval: Use a meaningful --query per file (e.g. "storage
layer" for db.py, "auth middleware" for auth.py). The file path alone
may not retrieve all relevant decisions — describe the domain of the file,
not just its name.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 31 lines · 7 tokens per session scan A d592bc45f827
review is a command published in the GitHub repository MnemeHQ/mneme (20 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 7 tokens to every session and 250 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
mempalace-status
Show the current state of your memory palace — wings, rooms, drawer counts, and suggestions.
ingest
Ingest source material into an active wiki. Accepts URLs, file paths, PDFs, freeform text, or processes the inbox. Supports tweets via Grok MCP.
speckit.archive
Archive a feature specification into main project memory after merge, resolving gaps and conflicts.
ingest-l1
L1 analysis loop for the abapwiki knowledge base: for each batch it launches the abap-analyzer sub-agent in parallel, then the adversarial judge abap-deepcheck (separate session), applies only the analyses that pass the fail-closed gate, and commits. Resumes exactly after an interruption. Use this skill to document…
bootstrap-memory
RUN { git ls-files; git ls-files --others --exclude-standard; } 2>/dev/null | sort -u | xargs wc -l 2>/dev/null | sort -rn | head -150 READ README.md.
projects
列出已注册的项目及其直觉（instinct）计数.