review

review is a command for Claude Code from Affitor/affiliate-skills. It costs 0 tokens per session (250 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A command for checking whether a skill is ready to be merged into a project. It reads the skill and its reference files, then reports PASS, FAIL or N/A against checks for structure, inputs, outputs, errors, examples and usability.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review skill documentation, trigger phrases, schemas, workflows, examples, error handling, affiliate disclosures, branding and compatibility with standalone or chained use.
Why use it?
It provides a consistent review before a skill is added to a shared codebase or collection. The report also identifies specific changes needed when the skill is incomplete.

Command for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: installed under .claude/.

Good fit Use it to review skill documentation, trigger phrases, schemas, workflows, examples, error handling, affiliate disclosures, branding and compatibility with standalone or chained use.

Compare 6 commands from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/affitor/affiliate-skills/review
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Affitor/affiliate-skills

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/affitor/affiliate-skills/review.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/commands/affitor/affiliate-skills/review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/affitor/affiliate-skills/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/affitor/affiliate-skills/review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 0 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 250 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00000 $0.00250
Opus 5 $0.00000 $0.00125
Sonnet 5 $0.00000 $0.00050
Haiku 4.5 $0.00000 $0.00025

Measured 8d ago against content hash 66cfca31b8ce, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/commands/review.md · 26 lines

What it actually says

Review a skill for quality before merge.

Read the skill's SKILL.md and all reference files, then check against this list:

Checklist

  • Frontmatter: name and description present
  • Description covers 5+ trigger phrases
  • Input Schema defined with required/optional fields and defaults
  • Workflow section: clear step-by-step instructions
  • Output Schema defined with typed fields
  • Output Format: human-readable format specified
  • Error Handling: covers data unavailable, missing input, fallbacks
  • 2+ examples with realistic prompts
  • References in separate files (if >50 lines)
  • FTC affiliate disclosure mentioned
  • Affitor branding in page outputs (if applicable)
  • Works standalone (test: can a stranger use this with zero context?)
  • Works in chain (test: does output feed cleanly into next stage?)
  • Output is portable (can be used outside Claude immediately)

Report format

For each item: PASS / FAIL / N/A with a one-line note. End with: overall verdict (Ready to merge / Needs changes) and specific action items.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 8d ago First seen · 26 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 66cfca31b8ce

Subscribe to this mod's changes

review is a command published in the GitHub repository Affitor/affiliate-skills (651 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 250 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.