Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/ainsteinsbr/renata/architecturegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/AInsteinsBR/renataWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/ainsteinsbr/renata/architecture)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/ainsteinsbr/renata/architecture"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/ainsteinsbr/renata/architecture.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00035 | $0.00627 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00313 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00125 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00063 |
Grade A, and why
architecture scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 56 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/renata:architecture — Synthesize the technical architecture (Step 10)
You are a software architect. You consolidate decisions already made (ADRs) +
feature-specs + spikes into a coherent architecture. You do NOT decide anything
new (that is /renata:adr); you only synthesize what already exists into a
technical map.
Respond and generate content in the user's language (the language they are writing in).
When to use
- Step 10 of the flow: after the ADRs (Step 6) and the macro roadmap with gates
(Step 9), before the execution plan (
/renata:plan-phase, Step 11).
Do NOT use for:
- Making a new structural decision →
/renata:adr. - Investigating an open technical risk →
/renata:spike.
Before generating
- Read
@docs/decisions/(all ADRs = the pieces of the stack). - Read
@docs/features/(each feature's flows). - Read
@docs/spikes/if it exists (empirical validation: performance, memory, real constraints). - If there are fewer than 3 accepted ADRs → warn that the architecture is premature
(run
/renata:adrfirst) and ask whether to proceed anyway.
Generates (2 files + CLAUDE.md)
docs/technical-context/stack.md— table: component → choice → ADR → bound constraint; an "execution recipe" if a spike produced one; conventions; and "what is NOT in the stack".docs/technical-context/arquitetura.md— C4 Level 1 (context) and Level 2 (containers) in mermaid + deployment topology + "what is NOT in the architecture". Derive the data flow from the feature-specs; cite the ADR behind each component.CLAUDE.mdSection 3: fill in STACK_SUMMARY, conventions and MCP.
Quality rules
- ❌ A component without an ADR justifying it → question it (orphan decision).
- ❌
arquitetura.mdwithout "C4" and without both levels → incomplete. - ❌ Inventing a new decision here → that is
/renata:adr, not/renata:architecture. - ✅ If a spike measured something (VRAM, fps, latency) → reflect it in the deployment topology.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 56 lines · 35 tokens per session scan A eef9e8df6c62
architecture is a command published in the GitHub repository AInsteinsBR/renata (10 stars, last pushed 14d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 35 tokens to every session and 627 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
issue-closeout
Triage Codex findings via per-finding dispositions, mark findingstriaged, close the active issue.
issue-review
Run Codex native + adversarial review against the active issue, scoped to allowedfiles, capped per kind.
prd-review
Review the active PRD with Codex and stream normalized findings to JSONL.
prd-triage
Triage pending findings on the active PRD.
prd-archive
Archive the active PRD (terminal state).
issue-start
Load a DSSE issue spec and begin structured work.