impact-review

impact-review is a command for Claude Code from akholod/consensus-review. It costs 16 tokens per session (191 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A read-only command that reviews a code change and checks how it may affect nearby or dependent parts of the system.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it on the current working tree or a pull request to check correctness, regressions, security, migration and deployment safety, and related code.
Why use it?
Reviewing only edited lines can miss a broken caller, contract, data rule, or deployment step elsewhere.

Command for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: argument-hint in frontmatter. Also seen: mentions subagents.

Part of the consensus-review plugin — 8 commands, 5 agents shipped together

Good fit Use it on the current working tree or a pull request to…

Compare 6 commands from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/akholod/consensus-review/impact-review
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/akholod/consensus-review

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install consensus-review, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 8 commands, 5 agents.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for impact-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/akholod/consensus-review/impact-review.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/commands/akholod/consensus-review/impact-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/akholod/consensus-review/impact-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/akholod/consensus-review/impact-review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 16 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 191 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00016 $0.00191
Opus 5 $0.00008 $0.00096
Sonnet 5 $0.00003 $0.00038
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00019

Measured 6d ago against content hash 013bbb18697d, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-06, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

impact-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

commands/impact-review.md · 14 lines

What it actually says

Run the impact-reviewer subagent via Task and return its full structured result without abridgement (starting with the one-line verdict).

  • subagent_type: "impact-reviewer" (when installed as a plugin and the bare name does not resolve — consensus-review:impact-reviewer)
  • Pass the scope from the args below into the prompt. Empty → current working tree (staged + unstaged); a PR URL/ref → that PR (all commits against base).
  • Pass the output language if lang=en|ua|ru is present (default English).
  • This is a read-only review: do not edit or commit anything. Stop after returning the result.

Scope: $ARGUMENTS

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 6d ago First seen · 14 lines · 16 tokens per session scan A 013bbb18697d

Subscribe to this mod's changes

impact-review is a command published in the GitHub repository akholod/consensus-review (3 stars, last pushed 18d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 16 tokens to every session and 191 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.