Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add akougkas/wtf-p/plugin install wtfpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/akougkas/wtf-p/export-latex)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/akougkas/wtf-p/export-latex"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/akougkas/wtf-p/export-latex/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/akougkas/wtf-p/export-latex"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/akougkas/wtf-p/export-latex.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00015 | $0.01017 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00407 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00203 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00102 |
Grade A, and why
export-latex scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 29d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
86% identical to add-todo — 46 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 75 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Export LaTeX
@${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/project/README.md @${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/wtfp-deliver-research/SKILL.md @${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/wtfp-deliver-research/references/actions.md
Record contract
Read: project://manifest, project://config, project://structure/outline, project://sources/{source}, project://evidence/{evidence}, project://paper/{artifact}.
Produce: project://deliverables/latex/{artifact} (create).
Resolve every logical URI through the host adapter. Portable v1 JSON records are the source of truth: schema-validate before a write, preserve stable IDs, update revision and timestamps where required, and replace records atomically. Never pass a literal logical URI to a shell command or infer record state from a legacy Markdown control file.
Manuscript prose and supporting context, research, plan, review, summary, handoff, and deliverable artifacts retain their authored format (normally Markdown). Link them from the relevant v1 record; do not convert manuscript prose into project-state JSON.
Procedure
- Confirm venue template and whether an existing deliverable may be replaced.
- Convert manuscript structure, citations, figures, tables, and bibliography without inventing content or metadata.
- Write a self-contained LaTeX deliverable and run the declared bibliography tools through the bundled dispatcher below. Bibliography entries for the deliverable come from
bib-formatin its defaultbibtexstyle, which emits standard entry types; never pass--style=al-foliofor a LaTeX export, since that projection does not compile under bibtex or biber. This action does not compile LaTeX and declares no effect that would let it: if the author asks for a PDF, report the portability limitations you observed and return a labeled handoff naming the exact compile command for their own toolchain.
Bundled tool execution
The declared tool.execute effect authorises exactly one command, run from the package root the host resolves for this bundle:
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 29d ago Changed 234966c3b380
- 1mo ago First seen · 75 lines · 15 tokens per session scan A 568e02a31d78
export-latex is a command published in the GitHub repository akougkas/wtf-p (20 stars, last pushed 11d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 15 tokens to every session and 1,017 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 86% identical to add-todo, differing in 46 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other commands, from other repositories
gpd:arxiv-submission
Prepare a GPD-owned manuscript for arXiv submission with validation and packaging.
output
Generate output artifacts from active wiki content — summaries, reports, study guides, slide outlines, timelines, glossaries, comparisons. Outputs are filed back into the wiki.
spreadsheet-audit
Perform a 6-step audit of an Excel spreadsheet for formula correctness, formatting consistency, data integrity, boss-auditable simplicity, and spec compliance. Uses the excel-screenshot MCP server tools — no Excel installation required.
me-cfd-review
Review thermal-fluid CFD setup, boundary conditions, mesh, wall treatment, convergence, validation, and whether the claims are supported.
show
Display a past OCR review session.
research
Start or resume an academic research project — idea through literature, methodology, writing, feedback, and publishing.