Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add akougkas/wtf-p/plugin install wtfpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/akougkas/wtf-p/new-paper)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/akougkas/wtf-p/new-paper"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/akougkas/wtf-p/new-paper/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/akougkas/wtf-p/new-paper"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/akougkas/wtf-p/new-paper.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00011 | $0.00861 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00344 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00172 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00086 |
Grade A, and why
new-paper scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 29d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 69 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Start a new paper
@${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/project/README.md @${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/wtfp-start-project/SKILL.md @${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/wtfp-start-project/references/actions.md
Record contract
Read: project://manifest, project://materials/{artifact}, project://paper/{artifact}.
Produce: project://manifest (create), project://config (create), project://state (create), project://decisions (create), project://structure/outline (create).
Resolve every logical URI through the host adapter. Portable v1 JSON records are the source of truth: schema-validate before a write, preserve stable IDs, update revision and timestamps where required, and replace records atomically. Never pass a literal logical URI to a shell command or infer record state from a legacy Markdown control file.
Manuscript prose and supporting context, research, plan, review, summary, handoff, and deliverable artifacts retain their authored format (normally Markdown). Link them from the relevant v1 record; do not convert manuscript prose into project-state JSON.
Procedure
- Detect existing project://manifest first; stop and offer inspection or repair rather than reinitializing it.
- Interview for identity, argument, document type, audience, requirements, exclusions, format, gates, safety, and author decisions. Once the document type is known, propose the initial section set from
${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/templates/paper-outline.md, or from${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/templates/grant-proposal-outline.mdforgrant-proposal, which additionally requires a captured solicitation artifact before any section is proposed. - Preview the five v1 JSON records, validate every record and the cross-record
invariants, then create them atomically. In particular,
outline.sections[*].word_targetmust sum exactly tooutline.target_words; revise the proposed allocation before writing if it does not. Do not run git init, stage, commit, branch, or merge.
Safety and completion
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 29d ago Changed 70506f6560b6
- 1mo ago First seen · 69 lines · 11 tokens per session scan A 3ac373f46aae
new-paper is a command published in the GitHub repository akougkas/wtf-p (20 stars, last pushed 11d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 11 tokens to every session and 861 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-15.
Other commands, from other repositories
me-cfd-review
Review thermal-fluid CFD setup, boundary conditions, mesh, wall treatment, convergence, validation, and whether the claims are supported.
research
Start or resume an academic research project — idea through literature, methodology, writing, feedback, and publishing.
openehr-explain
One-stop router that explains or looks up any openEHR thing — auto-detects an archetype, a template, an RM/AM/BASE type, an RM structural concept, an ADL idiom, an AQL query or keyword, or a terminology code (replaces /archetype-explain, /template-explain, /type-spec, /rm-structure, /adl-idiom, /terminology).
gpd:write-paper
Structure and write a physics paper from project research results or a bounded external-authoring intake.
gpd:derive-equation
Perform a rigorous physics derivation with systematic verification at each step.
gpd:limiting-cases
Systematically identify and verify all relevant limiting cases for a result or phase.