Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Alenryuichi/openmemory-plusWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/alenryuichi/openmemory-plus/bmad-bmm-qa-automate)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/alenryuichi/openmemory-plus/bmad-bmm-qa-automate"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/alenryuichi/openmemory-plus/bmad-bmm-qa-automate/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/alenryuichi/openmemory-plus/bmad-bmm-qa-automate"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/alenryuichi/openmemory-plus/bmad-bmm-qa-automate.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00015 | $0.00191 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00096 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00038 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00019 |
Grade A, and why
qa-automate scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
66% identical to correct-course — 9 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
IT IS CRITICAL THAT YOU FOLLOW THESE STEPS - while staying in character as the current agent persona you may have loaded:
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 15 lines · 15 tokens per session scan A 04e8a858a16b
qa-automate is a command published in the GitHub repository Alenryuichi/openmemory-plus (20 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 15 tokens to every session and 191 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 66% identical to correct-course, differing in 9 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other commands, from other repositories
rclone_test_makefiles
Make a random file hierarchy in a directory.
rclone_test_changenotify
Log any change notify requests for the remote passed in.
rclone_test_makefile
Make files with random contents of the size given.
check-coverage
Check test coverage, identify gaps, and suggest which code needs tests.
run-tests-and-fix
Run the project's test suite, fix any failures, and report what changed.
execute-task
Execute a specific task and its sub-tasks systematically following a Test-Driven Development (TDD) workflow. This command reads task specifications from .code-captain/specs/ directories and implements features with comprehensive testing, following established code standards and best practices.