Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/allisoneer/agentic_auxilaryWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/allisoneer/agentic_auxilary/linear_ticket_2_pr)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/allisoneer/agentic_auxilary/linear_ticket_2_pr"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/allisoneer/agentic_auxilary/linear_ticket_2_pr/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/allisoneer/agentic_auxilary/linear_ticket_2_pr"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/allisoneer/agentic_auxilary/linear_ticket_2_pr.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00019 | $0.03227 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.01291 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00645 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00323 |
Grade A, and why
linear_ticket_2_pr scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 244 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
This command should keep routing, scope judgment, and stop/go decisions at the orchestrator level. Child sessions should do bounded work only: read/update Linear state, persist an artifact, research feasibility, plan, implement, verify, commit, generate the PR description, and use bash/gh tooling to push and create the PR.
The goal is to end in one of these grounded states:
- stopped early because no Linear ticket reference was provided
- stopped early because the ticket is not actionable enough and a precise question was posted on Linear
- stopped early because feasibility research surfaced blocking ambiguity and a precise question was posted on Linear
- completed through verified implementation, commit, PR creation, and Linear update with the PR link
<workflow_contract>
- Follow all 9 steps in order.
- Use
todowritestarting in Step 2 and keep exactly one taskin_progressat a time. - Treat
<userMessage>as loose natural language. In this first pass, support no modifiers or flags. - Require a Linear ticket key, Linear URL, or other identifiable Linear issue reference. If none is present, ask the user for one and stop.
- Do not create or switch branches. Assume the user already started this command on the correct branch.
- At every major stage, return control to the orchestrator for the next DAG decision. Child sessions execute bounded work; they do not autonomously continue into later stages.
- Before downstream codebase work, delegate full ticket intake, corpus export, and artifact-grounding handoff to a bounded Linear-capable child session. That delegated intake/export must:
- resolve the ticket, read the full ticket description, and paginate comments until the complete corpus is captured
- record explicit pagination-completion evidence, including how many comment pages were fetched and the terminal
has_more=falseresult - ensure the ticket is
In Progressif it is not already - persist the full corpus using the shared ticket-corpus artifact contract (stable filename + schema marker + snapshot disclaimer)
- run
thoughts_syncimmediately after writing the corpus artifact - return artifact metadata to the orchestrator, including the saved artifact path, exact current status, pagination-completion evidence, and enough ticket identifiers to continue the workflow groundedly
- Use a two-layer gate before planning or implementation:
- first a task-clarity gate
- then a feasibility-reconnaissance gate when codebase context is still needed
- If code changes are made, require appropriate verification before claiming completion. At minimum run
just checkandjust testunless a stronger or more targeted command set is clearly warranted. - The commit and PR phase must respect the agent-reset caveat: use
commit, then re-enter a bash-capable session for the actual git commit/push execution and initial PR creation or update, then usedescribe_pr, then use bash/gh tooling for any final PR update if needed. - Linear updates are required when stopping for insufficient scope and when a PR is created. Set the ticket to
In Progressat the start; at the end, use judgment about any obvious next status, but do not invent statuses. - The ticket-artifact validation stage gets one bounded refresh/fix retry. If the artifact still fails validation after that retry, stop and report the exact validation failure instead of looping. </workflow_contract>
<step_1>
Step 1: Resolve the Target Ticket
- Parse
<userMessage>as loose natural language. - Accept any of these as sufficient ticket references:
- a Linear issue key such as
ENG-123 - a Linear issue URL
- another identifiable Linear issue reference that a Linear child session can resolve responsibly
- a Linear issue key such as
- In this first pass, do not interpret modifiers, flags, or autonomy toggles from the input.
- If no Linear ticket reference is present, ask the user to provide one and stop.
- If multiple plausible tickets are referenced and one is not clearly primary, ask one concise clarification question and stop.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 244 lines · 19 tokens per session scan A aba7b8c956e5
linear_ticket_2_pr is a command published in the GitHub repository allisoneer/agentic_auxilary (79 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 19 tokens to every session and 3,227 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-08.
Other commands, from other repositories
template
Manage issue templates for streamlined issue creation.
fest-show
Show festival progression (in-progress tasks, roadmap, and dependency view).
add-note
Add an internal or external note to a ConnectWise PSA ticket.
dispatcher
Use when you want the orchestrator to pick the next repo to work on across your whole portfolio — it enumerates candidate repos below the confinement root, resolves free/busy from each repo's session.lock lease, ranks the FREE ones by backlog priority × staleness × readiness, recommends the single most worthwhile one…
sync-linear
Sync current work with Linear ticket status.
plc-project-status
Read .claude/skills/plc-project-status/SKILL.md and execute its official procedure. Target: $ARGUMENTS.