Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add allsmog/vuln-scout/plugin install vuln-scoutWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/allsmog/vuln-scout/report)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/allsmog/vuln-scout/report"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/allsmog/vuln-scout/report.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00034 | $0.01352 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00676 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00270 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00135 |
Grade A, and why
report scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 185 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Generate Findings Report
Generate a developer-facing report from .claude/findings.json.
Unified standalone renderer:
python3 "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/report.py" \
.claude/findings.json \
--format md \
--output security-report.md
Flags
| Flag | Effect |
|---|---|
--format |
Output md (default), json, sarif, html, pr-comment, or bundle |
--suppressions |
Apply .vuln-scout-ignore suppressions before rendering |
--fail-on |
Exit with code 2 if unsuppressed findings exist at or above the given severity |
Source of truth
- Read
.claude/findings.json - Validate it against
vuln-scout/references/findings.schema.json - Respect
kindfinding: reportable issuehotspot: risky audit pivot, shown separately from findings
Markdown report structure
1. Executive Summary
Include only unsuppressed entries where kind == "finding" in the severity table.
# Whitebox Penetration Test Report
## Executive Summary
### Risk Summary
| Severity | Count |
|----------|-------|
| Critical | X |
| High | X |
| Medium | X |
| Low | X |
| Info | X |
### Hotspots Requiring Follow-up
- [Title] ([file:line])
2. Detailed Findings
For each unsuppressed finding:
- ID / stable key
- Severity / verdict / confidence
- File / line / type / CWE
- Evidence block from
evidence - Remediation and verification notes
3. Hotspots
List unsuppressed hotspot entries separately. Do not merge them into severity totals.
4. Coverage and Workflow
Include:
- files scanned / skipped
- tools used
- whether diff-aware mode was enabled
- suppression file used, if any
JSON output
When --format json is used:
- emit the validated
.claude/findings.jsonpayload after suppressions are applied
python3 "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/report.py" \
.claude/findings.json \
--format json \
--suppressions <path> \
--output <output_file>
SARIF output
When --format sarif is used:
- convert
.claude/findings.jsonwith:
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 185 lines · 34 tokens per session scan A f34f0b3e2d69
report is a command published in the GitHub repository allsmog/vuln-scout (24 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 34 tokens to every session and 1,352 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
security-sast
Static Application Security Testing (SAST) for code vulnerability analysis across multiple languages and frameworks.
fix
Apply code-level fixes for ALL validated findings, one at a time — modifies the target repository's source code.
security-semgrep-setup
Check if Semgrep is installed and working. If not, install it using the best available method. Then log in to Semgrep Pro, enable the Pro engine, and run a local Pro scan in the current directory.
sessions
List all Claude Code sessions across all projects, sorted by most recent. Show project context, date, and the exact resume command for each session.
security-sast
Static Application Security Testing (SAST) for code vulnerability analysis across multiple languages and frameworks.
init
Install the formatters this repository needs, with every command visible before it runs.