Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/armanzeroeight/fastagent-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/armanzeroeight/fastagent-plugins/quick-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/armanzeroeight/fastagent-plugins/quick-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/armanzeroeight/fastagent-plugins/quick-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/armanzeroeight/fastagent-plugins/quick-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/armanzeroeight/fastagent-plugins/quick-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00014 | $0.00160 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00064 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00032 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00016 |
Grade A, and why
quick-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Quick Code Review
Perform a focused code review on $ARGUMENTS, prioritizing:
-
Critical Issues (must fix):
- Security vulnerabilities
- Logic errors and bugs
- Performance problems
- Breaking changes
-
Important Issues (should fix):
- Missing error handling
- Inadequate test coverage
- Poor naming or unclear code
Skip style preferences and minor optimizations. Provide:
- Clear issue descriptions
- Severity level (critical/important)
- Specific fix suggestions
- Line numbers where applicable
Keep feedback concise and actionable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 29 lines · 14 tokens per session scan A 4b8b780a79f0
quick-review is a command published in the GitHub repository armanzeroeight/fastagent-plugins (29 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 14 tokens to every session and 160 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
proof-capture
Capture PR-ready proof artifacts for a feature, with an attested fail-closed controller in strict mode.
bug-check
Run automated tests and build checks first, then agent code review. For each bug found, propose or document a regression test.
aidd-churn
Rank files by hotspot score to identify prime candidates for refactoring before PR review.
aidd-pr
Review a PR, resolve addressed comments, and generate /aidd-fix delegation prompts for remaining issues.
pre-pr-check
Perform a comprehensive pre-PR check: summarize changes, analyze risk, and generate a review checklist.
review-router
Route to the appropriate quality or review command based on the user's intent.