Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/yeaight7/agent-powerupsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/yeaight7/agent-powerups/review-router)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/yeaight7/agent-powerups/review-router"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/yeaight7/agent-powerups/review-router/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/yeaight7/agent-powerups/review-router"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/yeaight7/agent-powerups/review-router.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00008 | $0.00120 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00060 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00024 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00012 |
Grade A, and why
review-router scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Route to the appropriate quality or review command based on the user's intent.
| User wants | Invoke |
|---|---|
| Review code for quality and correctness | /code-review |
| Review an implementation plan for gaps | plan-checker agent |
| Security review of code | structured-code-reviewer agent with security focus |
Invoke the matched command directly or ask the user which command they want if intent is ambiguous.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 19 lines · 8 tokens per session scan A 2ba8d5b537e1
review-router is a command published in the GitHub repository yeaight7/agent-powerups (6 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 8 tokens to every session and 120 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
proof-capture
Capture PR-ready proof artifacts for a feature, with an attested fail-closed controller in strict mode.
quality-check
Run code quality analysis including code smell detection, complexity analysis, and refactoring recommendations.
advisor
Get a second opinion from Codex (GPT-5) on your current plan, diff, or a specific question.
triage
Triage review findings one by one — present pending TODOs for user decision (approve, skip, modify).
aidd-churn
Rank files by hotspot score to identify prime candidates for refactoring before PR review.
aidd-pr
Review a PR, resolve addressed comments, and generate /aidd-fix delegation prompts for remaining issues.