Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to ayushcodes10/echo-mem. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ayushcodes10/echo-mem/main/.claude/commands/github/pr-manager.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ayushcodes10/echo-memWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/ayushcodes10/echo-mem/pr-manager)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/ayushcodes10/echo-mem/pr-manager"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/ayushcodes10/echo-mem/pr-manager/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/ayushcodes10/echo-mem/pr-manager"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/ayushcodes10/echo-mem/pr-manager.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.01427 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00714 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00285 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00143 |
Grade A, and why
pr-manager scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to pr-manager — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 170 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
GitHub PR Manager
Purpose
Comprehensive pull request management with ruv-swarm coordination for automated reviews, testing, and merge workflows.
Capabilities
- Multi-reviewer coordination with swarm agents
- Automated conflict resolution and merge strategies
- Comprehensive testing integration and validation
- Real-time progress tracking with GitHub issue coordination
- Intelligent branch management and synchronization
Tools Available
mcp__github__create_pull_requestmcp__github__get_pull_requestmcp__github__list_pull_requestsmcp__github__create_pull_request_reviewmcp__github__merge_pull_requestmcp__github__get_pull_request_filesmcp__github__get_pull_request_statusmcp__github__update_pull_request_branchmcp__github__get_pull_request_commentsmcp__github__get_pull_request_reviewsmcp__claude-flow__*(all swarm coordination tools)TodoWrite,TodoRead,Task,Bash,Read,Write
Usage Patterns
1. Create and Manage PR with Swarm Coordination
// Initialize review swarm
mcp__claude-flow__swarm_init { topology: "mesh", maxAgents: 4 }
mcp__claude-flow__agent_spawn { type: "reviewer", name: "Code Quality Reviewer" }
mcp__claude-flow__agent_spawn { type: "tester", name: "Testing Agent" }
mcp__claude-flow__agent_spawn { type: "coordinator", name: "PR Coordinator" }
// Create PR and orchestrate review
mcp__github__create_pull_request {
owner: "ruvnet",
repo: "ruv-FANN",
title: "Integration: claude-code-flow and ruv-swarm",
head: "integration/claude-code-flow-ruv-swarm",
base: "main",
body: "Comprehensive integration between packages..."
}
// Orchestrate review process
mcp__claude-flow__task_orchestrate {
task: "Complete PR review with testing and validation",
strategy: "parallel",
priority: "high"
}
2. Automated Multi-File Review
// Get PR files and create parallel review tasks
mcp__github__get_pull_request_files { owner: "ruvnet", repo: "ruv-FANN", pull_number: 54 }
// Create coordinated reviews
mcp__github__create_pull_request_review {
owner: "ruvnet",
repo: "ruv-FANN",
pull_number: 54,
body: "Automated swarm review with comprehensive analysis",
event: "APPROVE",
comments: [
{ path: "package.json", line: 78, body: "Dependency integration verified" },
{ path: "src/index.js", line: 45, body: "Import structure optimized" }
]
}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 170 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 2857dfbb9a47
pr-manager is a command published in the GitHub repository ayushcodes10/echo-mem (1 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 1,427 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to pr-manager, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other commands, from other repositories
review-code
Read ALL memory bank code rules + best practices, check the files that changed, and APPLY fixes so they adhere. The active counterpart to /scan (which is read-only). Use after an AI session, before commit, to make changed files compliant.
unforgit-curate
Review and improve Unforgit memory quality.
speckit.spex.submit
Push and create PR for team review, with optional watch mode for CI monitoring.
git
The pre-finish status: branch, hygiene findings, message checks, workflow lint, template state.
memory-store
Store an insight, decision, or pattern to memory.
code-review
Code review for branch changes. Analyzes git diff between branches with multi-level depth (low/medium/high). Matches changes against task description. Returns structured report with severity levels and verdict.