Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/SpillwaveSolutions/agent-brainWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/spillwavesolutions/agent-brain/gsd-ship)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/spillwavesolutions/agent-brain/gsd-ship"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/spillwavesolutions/agent-brain/gsd-ship/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/spillwavesolutions/agent-brain/gsd-ship"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/spillwavesolutions/agent-brain/gsd-ship.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00013 | $0.00213 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00085 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00043 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00021 |
Grade A, and why
gsd-ship scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 27d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Closes the plan → execute → verify → ship loop.
<execution_context> @/Users/richardhightower/clients/spillwave/src/agent-brain/.opencode/get-shit-done/workflows/ship.md </execution_context>
Execute the ship workflow from @/Users/richardhightower/clients/spillwave/src/agent-brain/.opencode/get-shit-done/workflows/ship.md end-to-end.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 27d ago First seen · 23 lines · 13 tokens per session scan A 183ef157267c
gsd-ship is a command published in the GitHub repository SpillwaveSolutions/agent-brain (119 stars, last pushed 27d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 13 tokens to every session and 213 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-20.
Other commands, from other repositories
code-review
Review the current branch changes for bugs and style issues.
unforgit-curate
Review and improve Unforgit memory quality.
pr-manager
Comprehensive pull request management with ruv-swarm coordination for automated reviews, testing, and merge workflows.
pr-manager
Comprehensive pull request management with ruv-swarm coordination for automated reviews, testing, and merge workflows.
gsd:inbox
Triage and review open GitHub issues and PRs against project templates and contribution guidelines.
gsd:pr-branch
Create a clean PR branch by filtering out .planning/ commits — ready for code review.