Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/BanibrataChatterjee/AwesomeSalesforceSkillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/banibratachatterjee/awesomesalesforceskills/refactor-apex)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/banibratachatterjee/awesomesalesforceskills/refactor-apex"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/banibratachatterjee/awesomesalesforceskills/refactor-apex/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/banibratachatterjee/awesomesalesforceskills/refactor-apex"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/banibratachatterjee/awesomesalesforceskills/refactor-apex.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00458 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00229 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00092 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00046 |
Grade A, and why
refactor-apex scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
/refactor-apex — Refactor an Apex class to canonical patterns
Wraps agents/apex-refactorer/AGENT.md. Takes a target class, returns a refactored version + test class using templates/apex/.
Step 1 — Collect inputs
Ask the user:
1. Path to the Apex class to refactor?
Example: force-app/main/default/classes/AccountTrigger.cls
2. Any related paths the refactorer should read alongside it?
(Helper classes, existing test class — optional)
3. Is a target-org alias connected for MCP lookups? [optional]
(If yes, the refactorer will call validate_against_org to check for existing frameworks)
If the source path is missing or the file doesn't exist, STOP and ask for a valid path. Do not guess.
Step 2 — Load the agent
Read agents/apex-refactorer/AGENT.md in full. Also read every file it lists under Mandatory Reads Before Starting.
Step 3 — Execute the plan
Follow the 5-step plan inside the AGENT.md exactly:
- Classify the class shape
- Apply templates
- Insert CRUD/FLS enforcement
- Generate the test class
- (Optional) org validation
Step 4 — Deliver the output
Return the Output Contract block from the AGENT.md:
- Summary (shape, templates applied, confidence)
- Refactored files (one fenced block per generated file)
- Diff summary with per-change citation
- Risk notes
- Citations
Step 5 — Recommend follow-ups
After the refactor, suggest running (but do not auto-invoke):
/scan-securityon the refactored class/optimize-soqlif the class contains SOQL/gen-testsif the generated test class needs extension
What this command does NOT do
- Does not commit or deploy the refactored code.
- Does not run multiple files in a single invocation.
- Does not freestyle — every change cites a template or skill.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 68 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 8aa9a4197745
refactor-apex is a command published in the GitHub repository BanibrataChatterjee/AwesomeSalesforceSkills (3 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 458 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other commands, from other repositories
pr
Automated PR code quality review with language-aware analysis and project-specific profiles.
pr-enhance
Command "pr-enhance" from ruvnet/ruflo, covering pr-enhance, usage, options, examples and enhance pr.
refactor-sprint
Parallel refactor sprint — fires refactor-cleaner + code-simplifier + type-design-analyzer + tdd-guide simultaneously. Full cleanup in one pass.
quality-check-command
This command performs comprehensive code quality checks. Use it before commits or when implementation is complete.
review.speckit-test
Review the test automation implementation against the specification and the desired test pyramid shape; detect and explain misalignment - prioritise unit tests, identify high-value gaps and brittle tests, and provide actionable recommendations (including refactoring) to improve behavioural confidence.
gsd-quality
Route to the appropriate quality / review skill based on the user's intent. gsd-code-review-fix was absorbed by gsd-code-review --fix in #2790.