Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to Bita71/Agent-Workflow-Kit. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Bita71/Agent-Workflow-Kit/master/.claude/commands/review-full.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Bita71/Agent-Workflow-KitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/bita71/agent-workflow-kit/review-full)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/bita71/agent-workflow-kit/review-full"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/bita71/agent-workflow-kit/review-full/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/bita71/agent-workflow-kit/review-full"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/bita71/agent-workflow-kit/review-full.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00140 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00056 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00028 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00014 |
Grade A, and why
review-full scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
review-full
Orchestrate a full review of the current diff: Codex correctness (+ security by risk signals) in parallel with a strong-model design review, then deduplicate into one report. No code is edited in this command.
Follow docs/ai/commands/review-full.md exactly. Use docs/ai/agents/cli.md for
Codex CLI calls, the review-design subagent for design, and the review skills
(docs/ai/skills/review-correctness.md, review-security.md, review-design.md).
Write the merged report to docs/ai/reviews/YYYY-MM-DD-short-task.review.md.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 11 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A d52fc4a16aa4
review-full is a command published in the GitHub repository Bita71/Agent-Workflow-Kit (1 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 140 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
pr-review
Review a PR across multiple dimensions (description, code, scan, tests).
audit-agents-skills
Audit quality of agents, skills, and commands in a Claude Code project.
review
Review the current diff against project memory.
advanced-code-review-context
Advanced Code Review Phase 2: Context Analysis - load previous reviews, PR history, declined items.
code-review-give
Give mode for code-review: Review someone else's code with multi-pass analysis and structured recommendations.
review-design-verify
Phases 4-5 of reviewing-design-docs: Interface Verification + Implementation Simulation.