Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/bjorn-ingmanson/thefroject-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/bjorn-ingmanson/thefroject-plugins/sow)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/bjorn-ingmanson/thefroject-plugins/sow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/bjorn-ingmanson/thefroject-plugins/sow/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/bjorn-ingmanson/thefroject-plugins/sow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/bjorn-ingmanson/thefroject-plugins/sow.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00345 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00138 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00069 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00034 |
Grade A, and why
sow scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
/sow — Generate Statement of Work
Generate a ready-to-sign statement of work from proposal context.
Before you start
Read these skill files if they exist:
.claude/skills/proposal-voice/— copywriting rules for all client-facing docs.claude/skills/pricing-guidelines/— tiers, engagement models, pricing copy rules
Workflow
- Gather inputs:
- Read any existing proposal or demo deck in
outputs/ - Client name, project name, and engagement type
- Scope agreed during sales process
- Timeline and milestones
- Pricing and payment terms (reference pricing-guidelines)
- Read any existing proposal or demo deck in
- Generate the SOW:
- Parties — Your company and the client, with contacts
- Background — Brief context on why this engagement exists
- Scope of work — Specific deliverables with acceptance criteria
- Out of scope — Explicit boundaries to prevent scope creep
- Timeline — Milestones with dates and dependencies
- Team — Who's involved and their roles
- Investment — Pricing breakdown, payment schedule, terms
- Assumptions — What needs to be true for this to work
- Change process — How scope changes are handled
- Save to
outputs/sow-[client-name].md
Usage: /sow [client name] [optional: engagement type or reference to proposal]
Examples:
/sow Acme Corp — based on the demo-proposal in outputs//sow Northwind Traders — 3-month advisory engagement
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 33 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 4d7246b8e08d
sow is a command published in the GitHub repository bjorn-ingmanson/thefroject-plugins (1 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 345 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
sow compared with commands from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| sowbjorn-ingmanson/thefroject-plugins | Command | 1 | 4mo ago | MIT | A | 0 | Claude Code |
| deps-auditwshobson/agents | Command | 42k | 2d ago | MIT | A | 23 | Claude Code |
| review-epo-claimsRobThePCGuy/Claude-Patent-Creator | Command | 210 | 13d ago | MIT | A | 22 | Claude Code |
| review-policymlunato47/claude-grc-plugin | Command | 189 | 1mo ago | MIT | A | 12 | Claude Code |
| au-pspftractorjuice/arc-kit | Command | 2.3k | today | none | A | 37 | Claude Code |
| compliance-auditTheLobbi/claude | Command | 21 | 8d ago | MIT | A | 0 | Claude Code |
| app-store-auditmjmirza/app-store-compliance | Command | 402 | yesterday | none | A | 35 | Claude Code |