redesign

redesign is a command for Claude Code from boparaiamrit/skills-by-amrit. It costs 29 tokens per session (266 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A command that audits an application's backend and user interface before proposing a redesign. It examines APIs, data models, components, visual styles, and user journeys.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to inventory backend endpoints and frontend components, find duplicate components, review design styles and user flows, score consistency, and plan implementation stages.
Why use it?
It shows where a product is inconsistent or difficult to use and turns those findings into an ordered redesign plan.

Command for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin.

Part of the skills-by-amrit plugin — 33 skills, 34 commands, 9 agents shipped together

Good fit Use it to inventory backend endpoints and frontend components, find duplicate components, review design styles and user flows, score consistency, and plan implementation stages.

Compare 6 commands from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/boparaiamrit/skills-by-amrit/redesign
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/boparaiamrit/skills-by-amrit

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install skills-by-amrit, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 33 skills, 34 commands, 9 agents.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for redesign

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/boparaiamrit/skills-by-amrit/redesign/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/commands/boparaiamrit/skills-by-amrit/redesign)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/boparaiamrit/skills-by-amrit/redesign"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/boparaiamrit/skills-by-amrit/redesign/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for redesign

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/boparaiamrit/skills-by-amrit/redesign"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/boparaiamrit/skills-by-amrit/redesign.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 29 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 266 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00029 $0.00266
Opus 5 $0.00015 $0.00133
Sonnet 5 $0.00006 $0.00053
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00027

Measured 12d ago against content hash 6c382793520c, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

redesign scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

commands/redesign.md · 36 lines

What it actually says

/redesign

Triggers the ui-ux-redesign skill with the /redesign workflow.

Usage

/redesign
/redesign "the dashboard feels cluttered and inconsistent"
/redesign "we need to modernize the entire frontend"

What Happens

  1. Backend scan — maps every API endpoint and data model
  2. Component census — inventories every frontend component, detects duplicates
  3. Token extraction — extracts all colors, spacing, typography, radii, shadows
  4. UX analysis — walks every user flow, marks friction points
  5. Consistency scoring — rates visual uniformity 1-10 per area
  6. Recommendations — layered redesign plan (tokens → components → layout → pages → polish)
  7. Implementation plan — phased waves with effort estimates

Output

A comprehensive redesign audit report with:

  • Backend API & data inventory
  • Component census with duplicates
  • Design token audit (current vs recommended)
  • Visual consistency scores
  • Layered redesign recommendations with priority and effort
  • Phased implementation plan
Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 12d ago First seen · 36 lines · 29 tokens per session scan A 6c382793520c

Subscribe to this mod's changes

redesign is a command published in the GitHub repository boparaiamrit/skills-by-amrit (5 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 29 tokens to every session and 266 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.