check-workflow

check-workflow is a command for Claude Code from bybren-llc/a-safe-pulse. It costs 7 tokens per session (368 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of check-workflow, MIT.

A command that checks the current development workflow, including Git branch and commit state, its linked Linear ticket, rebasing, and documentation. Git records code history, while Linear is a tool for tracking work items.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it before review or handoff to inspect branch status, commit messages, ticket alignment, rebase needs, and documentation changes.
Why use it?
It catches process problems such as uncommitted changes, incorrect branch names, missing ticket links, and branches behind the development branch.

Command for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: allowed-tools in frontmatter. Also seen: mentions CLAUDE.md.

Good fit Use it before review or handoff to inspect branch status, commit messages, ticket alignment, rebase needs, and documentation changes.

Compare 6 commands from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/bybren-llc/a-safe-pulse/check-workflow
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/bybren-llc/a-safe-pulse

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for check-workflow

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/bybren-llc/a-safe-pulse/check-workflow.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/commands/bybren-llc/a-safe-pulse/check-workflow)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/bybren-llc/a-safe-pulse/check-workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/bybren-llc/a-safe-pulse/check-workflow.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 7 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 368 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 91% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00007 $0.00368
Opus 5 $0.00003 $0.00184
Sonnet 5 $0.00001 $0.00074
Haiku 4.5 $0.00001 $0.00037

Measured 2d ago against content hash 3abac523caff, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

check-workflow scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

91% identical to check-workflow — 6 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

.claude/commands/check-workflow.md · 84 lines

What it actually says

Perform a quick workflow health check against @CONTRIBUTING.md requirements.

Status Checks

1. Git Status

git status
git branch --show-current

Verify:

  • Current branch follows ASP-{number}-{description} format
  • No uncommitted changes (or document what's uncommitted)
  • Branch relationship to origin/dev

2. Linear Ticket Connection

Extract WOR number from branch name.

Check ticket status using Linear MCP:

mcp__linear-mcp__get_issue

Verify:

  • Ticket exists
  • Ticket is in appropriate status
  • Work aligns with ticket description

3. Commit History

Review commits since dev:

git log origin/dev..HEAD --oneline

Verify:

  • All commits follow SAFe format: type(scope): description [ASP-XXX]
  • All commits reference correct Linear ticket
  • Commit messages are descriptive

4. Rebase Status

Check if branch needs rebasing:

git fetch origin
git log HEAD..origin/dev --oneline

Report:

  • How many commits behind dev
  • Whether rebase is needed

5. Documentation Status

Check if docs need updating:

  • CLAUDE.md (architecture/commands changed?)
  • CONTRIBUTING.md (process changed?)
  • Feature-specific docs created?

Output Format

Provide traffic-light status:

  • ✅ GREEN: All checks pass, workflow healthy
  • ⚠️ YELLOW: Minor issues, can proceed with caution
  • ❌ RED: Blockers present, must fix before PR

List specific issues found and recommendations.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 84 lines · 7 tokens per session scan A 3abac523caff

Subscribe to this mod's changes

check-workflow is a command published in the GitHub repository bybren-llc/a-safe-pulse (9 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 7 tokens to every session and 368 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 91% identical to check-workflow, differing in 6 lines, and is treated as a copy.