Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/bybren-llc/a-safe-pulseWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/bybren-llc/a-safe-pulse/pre-pr)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/bybren-llc/a-safe-pulse/pre-pr"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/bybren-llc/a-safe-pulse/pre-pr/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/bybren-llc/a-safe-pulse/pre-pr"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/bybren-llc/a-safe-pulse/pre-pr.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00007 | $0.00594 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00238 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00119 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00059 |
Grade A, and why
pre-pr scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
92% identical to pre-pr — 10 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 123 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
📋 TEMPLATE: This command is a template. See "Customization Guide" below to adapt for your infrastructure.
You are preparing to create a Pull Request. Execute the MANDATORY @CONTRIBUTING.md validation workflow:
Validation Checklist
1. Code Quality Validation
Run CI validation suite:
npm test && npm run build
This runs:
- TypeScript type checking
- ESLint validation
- Unit tests
- Format checking
BLOCKER: Must pass before proceeding. Fix any failures.
2. Documentation Linting
Auto-fix markdown formatting:
npx markdownlint-cli2 --fix "**/*.md"
Verify no errors remain:
npx markdownlint-cli2 "**/*.md"
3. Git Status Check
Verify all changes committed:
git status
BLOCKER: No uncommitted changes allowed in PR.
4. Rebase onto Latest Dev
Fetch and rebase:
git fetch origin
git rebase origin/dev
BLOCKER: Must be up-to-date with dev branch.
5. Commit Message Validation
Check all commits follow SAFe format:
git log origin/dev..HEAD --oneline
Required format: type(scope): description [ASP-XXX]
BLOCKER: All commits must reference Linear ticket.
6. Documentation Updates
Verify related docs updated:
- CLAUDE.md (if architecture/workflow changed)
- CONTRIBUTING.md (if process changed)
- Specialized docs (feature-specific)
7. PR Template Ready
Confirm you can fill out ALL sections:
- 📋 Summary with Linear ticket link
- 🎯 Changes Made
- 🧪 Testing
- 📊 Impact Analysis
- 🔄 Multi-Team Coordination
- ✅ Pre-merge Checklist
Workflow
Execute steps 1-6 in order.
Report results for each step:
- ✅ PASS: Step completed successfully
- ⚠️ WARNING: Non-blocking issue found
- ❌ BLOCKER: Must fix before PR
Success Criteria
All validation steps pass. Ready to create PR with:
git push --force-with-lease origin {branch-name}
gh pr create --title "..." --body "..."
Report final status and any remaining blockers.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 123 lines · 7 tokens per session scan A 91521df9177d
pre-pr is a command published in the GitHub repository bybren-llc/a-safe-pulse (9 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 7 tokens to every session and 594 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 92% identical to pre-pr, differing in 10 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other commands, from other repositories
test-audit
Writes a versioned TESTAUDIT.md; with --fix, quarantines the rot in gated, revertible commits. TRIGGER WHEN: auditing a test suite, measuring test health, finding dead or flaky or redundant tests, or diagnosing failure causes and proposing temporary quarantine. DO NOT TRIGGER WHEN: one module's tests are consolidated…
check
Run project checks and fix any errors without committing.
act
Follow RED-GREEN-REFACTOR cycle approach for test-driven development.
implement
Execute all implementation tasks from tasks.md with test-driven development, parallel batching, and atomic commits.
compliance-check
Ejecuta todas las verificaciones de compliance de reglas.
git-workflow
Run review, tests, and commit steps, then prepare a pull request.