review

review is a command for Claude Code from ByteLandTechnology/gemini-cc. It costs 10 tokens per session (869 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of review, Apache-2.0.

A command that runs a review of the current local Git changes using Gemini, an AI model. It is review-only and returns the review without changing files.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review staged, unstaged, untracked, or branch-level changes, with options to run the review in the foreground, stream results, wait, or run it in the background.
Why use it?
It provides an automated review of work in progress or changes compared with a chosen base branch, while preserving the repository exactly as it is.

Command for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: allowed-tools in frontmatter. Also seen: names the AskUserQuestion tool; mentions Claude Code.

Runs only inside its plugin — its command needs a path that Claude Code sets for a plugin’s own hooks and for nothing else. Install the plugin, not this.

Part of the gemini plugin — 3 skills, 8 commands, 1 agent, 3 hooks shipped together

Good fit Use it to review staged, unstaged, untracked, or branch-level changes, with options to run the review in the foreground, stream results, wait, or run it in the background.

Compare 6 commands from other repositories ↓
Install

Getting it into your agent

This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.

Claude Code
/plugin marketplace add ByteLandTechnology/gemini-cc
Claude Code
/plugin install gemini

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install gemini, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 3 skills, 8 commands, 1 agent, 3 hooks.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/bytelandtechnology/gemini-cc/review.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/commands/bytelandtechnology/gemini-cc/review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/bytelandtechnology/gemini-cc/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/bytelandtechnology/gemini-cc/review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 10 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 869 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 83% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00010 $0.00869
Opus 5 $0.00005 $0.00434
Sonnet 5 $0.00002 $0.00174
Haiku 4.5 $0.00001 $0.00087

Measured 6d ago against content hash 78fdc8955068, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

83% identical to review — 40 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

plugins/gemini/commands/review.md · 74 lines

What it actually says

Run a Gemini-backed review through the shared plugin runtime.

Raw slash-command arguments: $ARGUMENTS

Core constraint:

  • This command is review-only.
  • Do not fix issues, apply patches, or suggest that you are about to make changes.
  • Your only job is to run the review and return Gemini's output verbatim to the user.

Execution mode rules:

  • If the raw arguments include both --background and --stream, stop and tell the user to choose one.
  • If the raw arguments include --stream, do not ask. Run the review in the foreground.
  • If the raw arguments include --wait, do not ask. Run the review in the foreground.
  • If the raw arguments include --background, do not ask. Run the review in a Claude background task.
  • Otherwise, estimate the review size before asking:
    • For working-tree review, start with git status --short --untracked-files=all.
    • For working-tree review, also inspect both git diff --shortstat --cached and git diff --shortstat.
    • For base-branch review, use git diff --shortstat <base>...HEAD.
    • Treat untracked files or directories as reviewable work even when git diff --shortstat is empty.
    • Only conclude there is nothing to review when the relevant working-tree status is empty or the explicit branch diff is empty.
    • Recommend waiting only when the review is clearly tiny, roughly 1-2 files total and no sign of a broader directory-sized change.
    • In every other case, including unclear size, recommend background.
    • When in doubt, run the review instead of declaring that there is nothing to review.
  • Then use AskUserQuestion exactly once with two options, putting the recommended option first and suffixing its label with (Recommended):
    • Wait for results
    • Run in background

Argument handling:

  • Preserve the user's arguments exactly.
  • Do not strip --wait or --background yourself.
  • Preserve --stream exactly when the user passes it.
  • Do not add extra review instructions or rewrite the user's intent.
  • The companion script parses --wait and --background, but Claude Code's Bash(..., run_in_background: true) is what actually detaches the run.
  • --stream forces foreground execution and conflicts with --background.
  • In stream mode, the review prints raw Gemini text incrementally instead of waiting for the final formatted render.
  • /gemini:review is native-review only. It does not support staged-only review, unstaged-only review, or extra focus text.
  • If the user needs custom review instructions or more adversarial framing, they should use /gemini:adversarial-review.

Foreground flow:

  • Use direct command execution syntax, not Bash, so foreground --stream output is not buffered by the tool layer.

  • Run: !node "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/gemini-companion.mjs" review "$ARGUMENTS"

  • Return the command stdout verbatim, exactly as-is.

  • Do not paraphrase, summarize, or add commentary before or after it.

  • Do not fix any issues mentioned in the review output.

Background flow:

  • Launch the review with Bash in the background:
Bash({
  command: `node "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/gemini-companion.mjs" review "$ARGUMENTS"`,
  description: "Gemini review",
  run_in_background: true,
});
  • Do not call BashOutput or wait for completion in this turn.
  • After launching the command, tell the user: "Gemini review started in the background. Check /gemini:status for progress."
Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 6d ago First seen · 74 lines · 10 tokens per session scan A 78fdc8955068

Subscribe to this mod's changes

review is a command published in the GitHub repository ByteLandTechnology/gemini-cc (1 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 10 tokens to every session and 869 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 83% identical to review, differing in 40 lines, and is treated as a copy.