Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add ByteLandTechnology/gemini-cc/plugin install geminiWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/bytelandtechnology/gemini-cc/review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/bytelandtechnology/gemini-cc/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/bytelandtechnology/gemini-cc/review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00010 | $0.00869 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00434 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00174 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00087 |
Grade A, and why
review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
83% identical to review — 40 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
Run a Gemini-backed review through the shared plugin runtime.
Raw slash-command arguments:
$ARGUMENTS
Core constraint:
- This command is review-only.
- Do not fix issues, apply patches, or suggest that you are about to make changes.
- Your only job is to run the review and return Gemini's output verbatim to the user.
Execution mode rules:
- If the raw arguments include both
--backgroundand--stream, stop and tell the user to choose one. - If the raw arguments include
--stream, do not ask. Run the review in the foreground. - If the raw arguments include
--wait, do not ask. Run the review in the foreground. - If the raw arguments include
--background, do not ask. Run the review in a Claude background task. - Otherwise, estimate the review size before asking:
- For working-tree review, start with
git status --short --untracked-files=all. - For working-tree review, also inspect both
git diff --shortstat --cachedandgit diff --shortstat. - For base-branch review, use
git diff --shortstat <base>...HEAD. - Treat untracked files or directories as reviewable work even when
git diff --shortstatis empty. - Only conclude there is nothing to review when the relevant working-tree status is empty or the explicit branch diff is empty.
- Recommend waiting only when the review is clearly tiny, roughly 1-2 files total and no sign of a broader directory-sized change.
- In every other case, including unclear size, recommend background.
- When in doubt, run the review instead of declaring that there is nothing to review.
- For working-tree review, start with
- Then use
AskUserQuestionexactly once with two options, putting the recommended option first and suffixing its label with(Recommended):Wait for resultsRun in background
Argument handling:
- Preserve the user's arguments exactly.
- Do not strip
--waitor--backgroundyourself. - Preserve
--streamexactly when the user passes it. - Do not add extra review instructions or rewrite the user's intent.
- The companion script parses
--waitand--background, but Claude Code'sBash(..., run_in_background: true)is what actually detaches the run. --streamforces foreground execution and conflicts with--background.- In stream mode, the review prints raw Gemini text incrementally instead of waiting for the final formatted render.
/gemini:reviewis native-review only. It does not support staged-only review, unstaged-only review, or extra focus text.- If the user needs custom review instructions or more adversarial framing, they should use
/gemini:adversarial-review.
Foreground flow:
-
Use direct command execution syntax, not
Bash, so foreground--streamoutput is not buffered by the tool layer. -
Run: !
node "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/gemini-companion.mjs" review "$ARGUMENTS" -
Return the command stdout verbatim, exactly as-is.
-
Do not paraphrase, summarize, or add commentary before or after it.
-
Do not fix any issues mentioned in the review output.
Background flow:
- Launch the review with
Bashin the background:
Bash({
command: `node "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/gemini-companion.mjs" review "$ARGUMENTS"`,
description: "Gemini review",
run_in_background: true,
});
- Do not call
BashOutputor wait for completion in this turn. - After launching the command, tell the user: "Gemini review started in the background. Check
/gemini:statusfor progress."
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 74 lines · 10 tokens per session scan A 78fdc8955068
review is a command published in the GitHub repository ByteLandTechnology/gemini-cc (1 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 10 tokens to every session and 869 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 83% identical to review, differing in 40 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other commands, from other repositories
review
Get an independent cross-model review of the current diff from Antigravity (Gemini), then reconcile as the final judge.
review
Send the current git diff to Antigravity (agy) for code review. Optional focus text to steer the review.
review
Multi-agent code review with parallel validation.
ship
Branch, commit, open PR, gather Claude + every enabled AI reviewer (Copilot, CodeRabbit, etc.), fix/justify/resolve every finding, loop until clean, then merge. Run only when implementation is finished AND the owner has said to ship (e.g. "ship it") — never self-invoke just because the work looks done. To design and…
code-review-teach
Educational code review that teaches while reviewing. Provides constructive feedback, explains best practices, discusses trade-offs, and helps developers improve their coding skills.
hidden-dependencies
Discover hidden dependencies, implicit contracts, and non-obvious couplings in the codebase.