Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ChenyCHENYU/wl-skills-designWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/chenychenyu/wl-skills-design/validate-prototype)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/chenychenyu/wl-skills-design/validate-prototype"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/chenychenyu/wl-skills-design/validate-prototype/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/chenychenyu/wl-skills-design/validate-prototype"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/chenychenyu/wl-skills-design/validate-prototype.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00022 | $0.00165 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00066 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00033 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00016 |
Grade A, and why
validate-prototype scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 14 lines · 22 tokens per session scan A bd6f4fe376f4
validate-prototype is a command published in the GitHub repository ChenyCHENYU/wl-skills-design (5 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 22 tokens to every session and 165 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-06.
Other commands, from other repositories
fidelity
Measure how faithfully a clone reproduces a site — pixel-diff plus motion-fidelity into one 0-100 score, a letter grade, a ranked correction plan, and a shareable card.
qa
Verify the current work against the hard rules, the design, and the browsers it will meet.
ux-grill
Use when a running web app's UX has to be audited reproducibly rather than by feel — a deterministic mechanical pass over routes and viewports (axe, target size, horizontal overflow, page title, scripted journeys) followed by a screenshot-grounded interrogation of the operator, journey by journey, with two persona…
review
Review the current git diff — auditor selected by --mode (general, security, a11y, deps, perf, tests, contributor-trust, ux) or auto-inferred from the diff when omitted. Pass a PR number to review a specific PR; use --check-followup to re-check a PR after the owner has addressed feedback.
stark-dogfood
Use this command when testing whether Stark actually generates better designs, refreshing proof screenshots, creating showcase examples, or turning generated-output failures into guidance changes.
review
A command for reviewing a web page against a Figma design. It produces a pixel-level difference report and an AI-based visual assessment.