Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to cisco-foundation-ai/fully-automated-prompt-optimization. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/cisco-foundation-ai/fully-automated-prompt-optimization/main/.claude/commands/synthetic-samples.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/cisco-foundation-ai/fully-automated-prompt-optimizationWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/cisco-foundation-ai/fully-automated-prompt-optimization/synthetic-samples)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/cisco-foundation-ai/fully-automated-prompt-optimization/synthetic-samples"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/cisco-foundation-ai/fully-automated-prompt-optimization/synthetic-samples/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/cisco-foundation-ai/fully-automated-prompt-optimization/synthetic-samples"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/cisco-foundation-ai/fully-automated-prompt-optimization/synthetic-samples.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.01001 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00500 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00200 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00100 |
Grade A, and why
synthetic-samples scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 70 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
description: > Create realistic synthetic examples for eval dataset augmentation. TRIGGER when: user wants to create synthetic test cases, add edge cases, augment eval datasets, expand test coverage, create hard cases, or generate new evaluation examples. DO NOT TRIGGER when: user is pruning/cleaning existing synthetic data (use synthetic-pruner), running evals (use eval-runner), or optimizing prompts (use optimization agent).
Synthetic Samples
Scope
- Create realistic synthetic examples under a tenant synthetic examples root (for example,
tenants/<tenant_id>/datasets/synthetic_artifacts/). - Keep customer/source artifacts untouched (
tenants/*/source_artifacts/). - Produce review CSVs for model-assisted labeling.
- Keep all content synthetic and non-attributable. No real customer names, domains, or IPs.
Quick Start Workflow
- Pick a scenario type: benign, phishing, credential theft, BEC, malware delivery, or false positive.
- Choose a naming pattern and create the example directory.
- Populate context files using the templates below.
- Write
Summary.pdf.txtwith explicit labels that match CSV heuristics. - Add/refresh
labels_review.csvorhard_labels_review.csventries.
Standard Example Structure
Each example directory should include:
Prompt.pdf.txt(placeholder or template reference)Context - Tools.pdf.txt(copy from a tenant baseline example if available)Context - Stealth Watch.pdf.txtContext - Email Body.pdf.txtorContext - No Email Body.pdf.txtSummary.pdf.txt(explicit label language)
Naming
- Regular:
Example N - <Descriptor> - Hard cases:
Hard Example N - <Descriptor>
Labeling Workflow
- Propose labels in a CSV (
labels_review.csvorhard_labels_review.csv). - Keep labels aligned with
Summary.pdf.txttext so existing heuristics extract GT. - If a file is removed, update both CSVs so row counts and filenames stay aligned.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 70 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A db43af23350d
synthetic-samples is a command published in the GitHub repository cisco-foundation-ai/fully-automated-prompt-optimization (107 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 1,001 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
prototype
You are building a proof-of-concept for the current Grainulator sprint. Read CLAUDE.md for sprint context and claims.json for existing research claims.
qa-changes
This skill should be used when the user asks to "QA a pull request", "test PR changes", "verify a PR works", "functionally test changes", or when an automated workflow triggers QA validation of code changes. Provides a structured methodology for setting up the environment, exercising changed behavior, and reporting…
verify
Run repository verification using the verification-loop skill.
test-coverage
Analyze test coverage and identify the highest-value gaps to fill.
tdd
A command that follows test-driven development (TDD), a method where you write tests before the code they check. It moves through writing a failing test, adding the smallest implementation, and then improving the code.
check-dev
Type-check a Z specification with fuzz.