Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add closedloop-ai/claude-plugins/plugin install code-reviewWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/closedloop-ai/claude-plugins/deep)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/closedloop-ai/claude-plugins/deep"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/closedloop-ai/claude-plugins/deep/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/closedloop-ai/claude-plugins/deep"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/closedloop-ai/claude-plugins/deep.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00030 | $0.01069 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00428 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00214 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00107 |
Grade A, and why
deep scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 46 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Deep Code Review (PLN-807 + FEA-1401)
This command is shorthand for /start --depth deep. Follow every instruction in ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/commands/start.md verbatim, with one binding:
DEPTH = "deep" for the entire run. Pass --depth deep to every helper that accepts the flag (notably prepare-run, hygiene, review-state-read, and review-state-write).
What deep does
Deep produces the standard fleet plus two deep-only conditional core reviewers: the always-on Design Critic and the signal-gated Impact Analyzer (FEA-1401).
The Design Critic runs on every deep review (no trigger required). It evaluates the change for software-design craftsmanship — module depth and information hiding, SOLID adherence, dependency direction and layer boundaries, and project/package structure — drawing on A Philosophy of Software Design, the SOLID principles, and Clean Architecture. It flags only design flaws this change introduces or demonstrably worsens (a new shallow module, a wrong-direction dependency, a god-class this PR grew, a type-switch it extended), runs on Sonnet, and is exempt from the domain-critic cap (it is a source: "core" reviewer, not a project-specific critic). Like the Impact Analyzer it is code-intelligence-aware: when the operator's session provides an MCP server that indexes the repo, it uses that server for module/layer layout and for dependency direction and import cycles, falling back to grep otherwise. The plugin is substrate-agnostic — it names no particular server and works with whichever one is connected. Findings carry category: "Code Quality".
The Impact Analyzer (FEA-1401) spawns when signal extraction detects exported_symbol_change or symbol_deletion in the diff. It identifies changed exported symbols (function signatures, type definitions, exported constants, class API, schema fields, deletions), greps the codebase for external usages outside the diff, and emits findings whose external_impact[] array lists every callsite that breaks under the new signature.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed a7b89ebef6f6
- 1mo ago First seen · 46 lines · 30 tokens per session scan A 763b1b8ed13d
deep is a command published in the GitHub repository closedloop-ai/claude-plugins (122 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 30 tokens to every session and 1,069 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
cpp-review
Comprehensive C++ code review for memory safety, modern C++ idioms, concurrency, and security. Invokes the cpp-reviewer agent.
refactor-clean
Remove dead code and consolidate duplicates.
refactor-clean
Refactor provided code for cleanliness, maintainability, and alignment with SOLID principles and modern best practices — no over-engineering.
team-review
Launch a multi-reviewer parallel code review with specialized review dimensions.
rust-review
Rust code review for ownership, safety, and idiomatic patterns.
refactor
Clean up dead code, reduce duplication, and simplify structure without changing behavior.