Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/CloudAI-X/opencode-workflowWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/cloudai-x/opencode-workflow/parallel)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/cloudai-x/opencode-workflow/parallel"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/cloudai-x/opencode-workflow/parallel/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/cloudai-x/opencode-workflow/parallel"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/cloudai-x/opencode-workflow/parallel.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00010 | $0.00972 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00389 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00194 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00097 |
Grade A, and why
parallel scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 162 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Parallel Execution Command
Demonstrates the parallel execution pattern from claude-workflow-v2 by launching multiple independent subagents in a single message.
Core Principle
ALL Task calls MUST be in a SINGLE assistant message for true parallelism.
If Task calls are in separate messages, they run sequentially, negating the performance benefit.
Phase 1: Analyze the Request
Parse $ARGUMENTS to determine parallel tasks:
- Task-based: Multiple independent tasks to execute
- Directory-based: Multiple directories to analyze
- Perspective-based: Multiple review angles on same code
If no arguments, demonstrate with a default parallel analysis of the project.
Phase 2: Identify Independent Tasks
For parallelization, tasks must be:
- Independent: No dependencies between them
- Non-conflicting: Don't modify the same files
- Self-contained: Each can complete without the other
Examples of good parallel candidates:
- Code review + Security audit + Test analysis
- Analyze src/ + Analyze lib/ + Analyze tests/
- Check TypeScript + Check ESLint + Check tests
Phase 3: Execute in Parallel
Launch ALL subagents in a SINGLE message using the Task tool:
In ONE message, spawn multiple Task calls:
Task 1: "@code-reviewer Review the authentication module for quality issues"
Task 2: "@security-auditor Check authentication for vulnerabilities"
Task 3: "@test-architect Analyze test coverage for authentication"
Parallelization Patterns
Pattern A: Multi-Perspective Review
Spawn in parallel:
- Logic Reviewer: Focus on correctness and edge cases
- Performance Reviewer: Focus on efficiency and bottlenecks
- Security Reviewer: Focus on vulnerabilities
- Maintainability Reviewer: Focus on code quality
Pattern B: Directory Parallelization
Spawn in parallel:
- Subagent 1: Analyze src/api/
- Subagent 2: Analyze src/models/
- Subagent 3: Analyze src/utils/
Pattern C: Full Verification Suite
Spawn in parallel:
- Type Checker: Run TypeScript/mypy
- Linter: Run ESLint/ruff
- Test Runner: Execute test suite
- Security Scanner: Check for vulnerabilities
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 162 lines · 10 tokens per session scan A cf3bc3104991
parallel is a command published in the GitHub repository CloudAI-X/opencode-workflow (275 stars, last pushed 10mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 10 tokens to every session and 972 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
parallel compared with commands from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| parallelCloudAI-X/opencode-workflow | Command | 275 | 10mo ago | MIT | A | 10 | Claude Code |
| checklistgithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 13 | Claude Code |
| clarifygithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 27 | Claude Code |
| specifygithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 13 | Claude Code |
| analyzegithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 26 | Claude Code |
| convergegithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 35 | Claude Code |
| implementgithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 14 | Claude Code |